This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Classic ASP Security Project - 50 Review - Self Evaluation - A"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Click here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" styl...)
 
(Initial Progress Update)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Classic ASP Security Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Classic ASP Security Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
* Creation of a Common Object Repository for ASP applications based on OWASP ESAPI Project including objects and/or references to libraries for security applications all this aligned with OWASP Top10 and OWASP Guide. (In progress)
 +
* Create Documentation aligned to OWASP Code Review Project Checklist providing additional technology-specific checks. (Done)
 +
* Addition of expression for Code Review Tool to support Classic ASP applications. (Done)
 +
* Implementation of Version 1 of Stinger for ASP either by using an installable COM library or ISAPI. (missing)
 +
* This same module will compliment the OWASP Validation Documentation Project. (missing)
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
Line 20: Line 25:
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Classic ASP Security Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Classic ASP Security Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
* Creation of a Common Object Repository for ASP applications based on OWASP ESAPI Project (50% or ESAPI classes)
 +
* Create Documentation aligned to OWASP Code Review Project Checklist providing additional technology-specific checks. (100% it it published in OWASP site by now)
 +
* Addition of expression for Code Review Tool to support Classic ASP applications. (100% DB update with ASP keyworkds sent to code review project owner)
 +
* Implementation of Version 1 of Stinger for ASP either by using an installable COM library or ISAPI. (0%)
 +
* This same module will compliment the OWASP Validation Documentation Project. (0%)
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  |-
 
  |-
Line 25: Line 35:
 
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
 
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
None so far, eveything is going smooth :)
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 04:47, 28 June 2008

Click here to return to the previous page.

50% REVIEW PROCESS

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Classic ASP Security Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

  • Creation of a Common Object Repository for ASP applications based on OWASP ESAPI Project including objects and/or references to libraries for security applications all this aligned with OWASP Top10 and OWASP Guide. (In progress)
  • Create Documentation aligned to OWASP Code Review Project Checklist providing additional technology-specific checks. (Done)
  • Addition of expression for Code Review Tool to support Classic ASP applications. (Done)
  • Implementation of Version 1 of Stinger for ASP either by using an installable COM library or ISAPI. (missing)
  • This same module will compliment the OWASP Validation Documentation Project. (missing)

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

  • Creation of a Common Object Repository for ASP applications based on OWASP ESAPI Project (50% or ESAPI classes)
  • Create Documentation aligned to OWASP Code Review Project Checklist providing additional technology-specific checks. (100% it it published in OWASP site by now)
  • Addition of expression for Code Review Tool to support Classic ASP applications. (100% DB update with ASP keyworkds sent to code review project owner)
  • Implementation of Version 1 of Stinger for ASP either by using an installable COM library or ISAPI. (0%)
  • This same module will compliment the OWASP Validation Documentation Project. (0%)

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

None so far, eveything is going smooth :)