This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template JSP Testing Tool Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"
From OWASP
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="ba...) |
Fabriciofuji (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#P028 - OWASP UI Component Verification Project (a.k.a. OWASP JSP Testing Tool)|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | 1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#P028 - OWASP UI Component Verification Project (a.k.a. OWASP JSP Testing Tool)|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | ||
| − | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Design documentation, code, and user documentation have been completed. Performance needs tunning, but the display of incremental progress improved significantly the perception of performance. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#P028 - OWASP UI Component Verification Project (a.k.a. OWASP JSP Testing Tool)|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | 2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#P028 - OWASP UI Component Verification Project (a.k.a. OWASP JSP Testing Tool)|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | ||
| − | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|90% |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
| − | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|The tests were run in FireFox 3.0.5, Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 and Internet Explorer 7.0.6. They were completed successfully only in FireFox 3.0.5. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | 1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | ||
| − | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
| − | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Considering the reviewer received a ZIP package with all required files needed to run the application, the "stand alone executable version" requirement may be considered fullfilled, remaining only two: "About Box" and "Documentation (on how to build it from code) must stored be in the same repository as the code". |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | ||
| − | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|N/A |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
| − | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Great job! |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 01:43, 16 February 2009
Clik here to return to the previous page.
| FINAL REVIEW | ||
|---|---|---|
| PART I | ||
|
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
Design documentation, code, and user documentation have been completed. Performance needs tunning, but the display of incremental progress improved significantly the perception of performance. | |
|
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
90% | |
|
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
The tests were run in FireFox 3.0.5, Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 and Internet Explorer 7.0.6. They were completed successfully only in FireFox 3.0.5. | |
| PART II | ||
|
Assessment Criteria |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
None | |
|
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
Considering the reviewer received a ZIP package with all required files needed to run the application, the "stand alone executable version" requirement may be considered fullfilled, remaining only two: "About Box" and "Documentation (on how to build it from code) must stored be in the same repository as the code". | |
|
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
N/A | |
|
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Great job! | |
