This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chapter Handbook/Chapter 1: Handbook Overview"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(1.4: Contact Us: Comments, Suggestions, & Questions)
(1.4: Contact Us: Comments, Suggestions, & Questions)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Remove reference to Global Chapter Committee as it is not longer operational. Should we keep link to the global-chapter-committe mailing list or remove it? Pro: historical context. Con: as it is not operational we would need to close the list to new subscribers.
 
Remove reference to Global Chapter Committee as it is not longer operational. Should we keep link to the global-chapter-committe mailing list or remove it? Pro: historical context. Con: as it is not operational we would need to close the list to new subscribers.
 +
 +
*The Global Chapter Committee mailing list is: [mailto:[email protected] [email protected]]
 +
 +
*The mailing list archives and instructions for subscribing to the list are available at: https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/global_chapter_committee
 +
  
 
[[User:Nwhysel|Nwhysel]] ([[User talk:Nwhysel|talk]]) 12:37, 24 March 2015 (CDT)
 
[[User:Nwhysel|Nwhysel]] ([[User talk:Nwhysel|talk]]) 12:37, 24 March 2015 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 20:19, 21 April 2015

Suggested edits are located on the Talk/Discussion pages of each chapter of the Chapter Leader Handbook. For each comment or suggested edits hat you would like to add, please create a bullet point under my signature, add your comment, then sign your name by adding four tildes (~) in a row and then click save. The four tildes will automatically be replaced with your name and time stamp when you save.

1.4: Contact Us: Comments, Suggestions, & Questions

Remove reference to Global Chapter Committee as it is not longer operational. Should we keep link to the global-chapter-committe mailing list or remove it? Pro: historical context. Con: as it is not operational we would need to close the list to new subscribers.


Nwhysel (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2015 (CDT)