This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2009-11-23"
From OWASP
(→Current Meeting) |
Bradcausey (talk | contribs) (→Current Meeting) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Current Meeting == | == Current Meeting == | ||
| − | *[[:Summit 2009|"OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"]]/[[:OWASP AppSec DC 2009]] - Wrap-up: | + | *[[:Summit 2009|"OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"]]/[[:OWASP AppSec DC 2009]] - Wrap-up: |
**Decisions made in DC with impact on GPC activity, | **Decisions made in DC with impact on GPC activity, | ||
**Has the GPC had the opportunity to contact M. Bobersky to answer his questions? [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/Doc?docid=0AX4Puwz7EA41ZGNuODk2MmNfNTRjZGd0OTdkcw&hl=en M. Boberski's questions] | **Has the GPC had the opportunity to contact M. Bobersky to answer his questions? [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/Doc?docid=0AX4Puwz7EA41ZGNuODk2MmNfNTRjZGd0OTdkcw&hl=en M. Boberski's questions] | ||
| − | * Leo wants to discuss about issues on usage of OWASP resources. Is this the right forum? | + | *Leo wants to discuss about issues on usage of OWASP resources. Is this the right forum? |
| − | **Brazilian AppSec Conference | + | **Brazilian AppSec Conference |
| − | **Brazilian book that has a translated version of Top10 "integrally", without any reference to OWASP | + | **Brazilian book that has a translated version of Top10 "integrally", without any reference to OWASP |
| + | *We should discuss the GPC "Chair" based on discussions at the Summit in DC. I am willing to take this on, but we can discuss further on the next call. (Brad) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | *Projects | + | *Projects |
| − | ** [[:Category: | + | **[[:Category:OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set Project#tab.3DProject_Details|OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set Project]] is ready for assessment and needs a GPC reviewer. Volunteers? |
| − | ** [[:Category:OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project|OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project]] is ready for assessment and needs '''TWO''' GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers? | + | **[[:Category:OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project|OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project]] is ready for assessment and needs '''TWO''' GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers? |
| − | * Releases translation process | + | *Releases translation process |
| − | ** Shall we handle this or let with other Committe? | + | **Shall we handle this or let with other Committe? |
| − | ** Define process only for docs or also tools? | + | **Define process only for docs or also tools? |
---- | ---- | ||
| − | *Project Reviewers, | + | |
| − | ** In the sequence of suggestions and comments previously made by Tom and Brad and Matt, I've created a [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|first straw of the page]] to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers. | + | *Project Reviewers, |
| + | **In the sequence of suggestions and comments previously made by Tom and Brad and Matt, I've created a [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|first straw of the page]] to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers. | ||
***Please check it out and let me know if you think any changes have to be made. | ***Please check it out and let me know if you think any changes have to be made. | ||
| − | ***Also, it seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list. | + | ***Also, it seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list. |
***If you agree with this methodology I ask if one of you have the spare cycles to produce the above referred job description. Later on a text to support the call for reviewers will also be needed - I will produce a first draft for your comments if nobody assumes first the task. | ***If you agree with this methodology I ask if one of you have the spare cycles to produce the above referred job description. Later on a text to support the call for reviewers will also be needed - I will produce a first draft for your comments if nobody assumes first the task. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
*GPC participation at the [http://www.ibwas.com/index.html Iberic Web Application Security] conference (IBWAS09): | *GPC participation at the [http://www.ibwas.com/index.html Iberic Web Application Security] conference (IBWAS09): | ||
| − | **For GPC's information, Paulo is partially using his time to assist the conference management team. | + | **For GPC's information, Paulo is partially using his time to assist the conference management team. |
**We need a 1h slide deck about OWASP projects to be delivered at the next AppSec Conference in Madrid. | **We need a 1h slide deck about OWASP projects to be delivered at the next AppSec Conference in Madrid. | ||
Revision as of 17:51, 24 November 2009
Previous meetings and Dial-in details
see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda and the Dial-In details
Agenda
Current Meeting
- "OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"/OWASP AppSec DC 2009 - Wrap-up:
- Decisions made in DC with impact on GPC activity,
- Has the GPC had the opportunity to contact M. Bobersky to answer his questions? M. Boberski's questions
- Leo wants to discuss about issues on usage of OWASP resources. Is this the right forum?
- Brazilian AppSec Conference
- Brazilian book that has a translated version of Top10 "integrally", without any reference to OWASP
- We should discuss the GPC "Chair" based on discussions at the Summit in DC. I am willing to take this on, but we can discuss further on the next call. (Brad)
- Projects
- OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set Project is ready for assessment and needs a GPC reviewer. Volunteers?
- OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project is ready for assessment and needs TWO GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers?
- Releases translation process
- Shall we handle this or let with other Committe?
- Define process only for docs or also tools?
- Project Reviewers,
- In the sequence of suggestions and comments previously made by Tom and Brad and Matt, I've created a first straw of the page to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers.
- Please check it out and let me know if you think any changes have to be made.
- Also, it seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.
- If you agree with this methodology I ask if one of you have the spare cycles to produce the above referred job description. Later on a text to support the call for reviewers will also be needed - I will produce a first draft for your comments if nobody assumes first the task.
- In the sequence of suggestions and comments previously made by Tom and Brad and Matt, I've created a first straw of the page to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers.
- GPC participation at the Iberic Web Application Security conference (IBWAS09):
- For GPC's information, Paulo is partially using his time to assist the conference management team.
- We need a 1h slide deck about OWASP projects to be delivered at the next AppSec Conference in Madrid.
From Previous Meeting/Follow up
- Spreading OWASP Project Details Tab through ALL OWASP Projects.
- Revised&improved wiki code to link projects and releases - Has this task been finished? Are there any available instructions/documentation?
Issues for next Meeting
- Add here
Minutes
- Meeting started 10H PM/GMT
- Add here
