This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Category:OWASP Project Assessment"
From OWASP
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| − | === Quality | + | === Quality Scale for Tools Projects=== |
{| class="wikitable" style="align: left; margin-right: 1em; " | {| class="wikitable" style="align: left; margin-right: 1em; " | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
! Example | ! Example | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Quality Release | + | |Quality Release |
| − | | | + | |
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
| + | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Beta Quality |
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Alpha Quality Release |
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 19:00, 28 January 2008
Work in progress
This assessment area focuses on assessing the quality of OWASP Tools and Documentation (Projects). The resulting ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
FAQ
- 1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?
- The rating system allows OWASP to monitor the quality of Projects in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content.
- 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
- Just add Template:Tl to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
- 3. Someone put a Template:Tl template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?
- Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
- 4. Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Military history WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
- 5. How do I rate an article?
- Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
- 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article?
- Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- 8. Where can I get more comments about an article?
- The review department can conduct more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for peer review there.
- 9. What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.
- 10. Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
- 11. What about lists?
- Lists are assessed using the same scale as other articles; however, they progress towards featured list rather than featured article status.
- 12. What if I have a question not listed here?
- If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page, or contact the project coordinators directly.
Quality Scale for Tools Projects
| Class | Criteria | Formal process | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Release | |||
| Beta Quality | |||
| Alpha Quality Release |
Requests for assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department.
-
Siege of Namur (1692) -
Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol - Add new requests above this line
If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please list it for peer review instead.
Log
A full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available; unfortunately, due to its extreme size, it cannot be transcluded directly.fr:Projet:Histoire militaire/Évaluation
Pages in category "OWASP Project Assessment"
The following 14 pages are in this category, out of 14 total.
