This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Getting Started"
From OWASP
(New page: the link to the Fred Brooks'article is no longer available) |
Bradcausey (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | the link to the Fred Brooks'article is no longer available | + | --- previous comment:the link to the Fred Brooks'article is no longer available 04/Jan/10 Dinis: Is this still valid? The link http://virtualschool.edu/mon/SoftwareEngineering/BrooksNoSilverBullet.html seems to be working --- The email thread i think that one of the early paths of getting involved in OWASP are: |
| + | |||
| + | *become an editor of the OWASP WIKI website | ||
| + | *review a couple OWASP projects (as per the OWASP Project [[Assessment Criteria v2.0]]<br> | ||
| + | * This is where I would probably contribute the most. I am trying to gather my thoughts on getting details on what a review is, and that type stuff. Here are my thoughts on paper: [http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/ http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/] | ||
| + | *point them to the key active projects in roadmap style (Top Ten -> ASVS -> Testing Guide -> Webscarab -> Code Review Guide -> Development Guide -> SAMM -> Webgoat -> ESAPI/AntiSamy) | ||
| + | *contribute graphics? | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:51, 5 January 2010
--- previous comment:the link to the Fred Brooks'article is no longer available 04/Jan/10 Dinis: Is this still valid? The link http://virtualschool.edu/mon/SoftwareEngineering/BrooksNoSilverBullet.html seems to be working --- The email thread i think that one of the early paths of getting involved in OWASP are:
- become an editor of the OWASP WIKI website
- review a couple OWASP projects (as per the OWASP Project Assessment Criteria v2.0
- This is where I would probably contribute the most. I am trying to gather my thoughts on getting details on what a review is, and that type stuff. Here are my thoughts on paper: http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/
- point them to the key active projects in roadmap style (Top Ten -> ASVS -> Testing Guide -> Webscarab -> Code Review Guide -> Development Guide -> SAMM -> Webgoat -> ESAPI/AntiSamy)
- contribute graphics?
