This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Chapters Assigned"
From OWASP
(21 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
#Steps and Roles | #Steps and Roles | ||
#Code Review Processes | #Code Review Processes | ||
+ | #Transaction Analysis - E Keary | ||
== Design review == | == Design review == | ||
− | #Designing for security | + | #Designing for security |
+ | ## - M Roxberry(.NET) | ||
+ | ## - Paolo Perego (Java) | ||
+ | ## - Andrew van der Stock (PHP) | ||
+ | ## - Paolo Perego (C) | ||
+ | ## - C++ | ||
+ | ## - Andrew van der Stock (MySQL) | ||
+ | ## - Mallory (AJAX) | ||
==Examples by Vulnerability== | ==Examples by Vulnerability== | ||
− | #Reviewing Code for Buffer Overruns and Overflows | + | #Reviewing Code for Buffer Overruns and Overflows - 100% |
− | #Reviewing Code for OS Injection | + | #Reviewing Code for OS Injection - 100% |
− | #Reviewing Code for SQL Injection | + | #Reviewing Code for SQL Injection - 100% |
− | #Reviewing Code for Data Validation | + | #Reviewing Code for Data Validation - - 100% |
− | #Reviewing Code for Error Handling | + | #Reviewing code for XSS issues - 100% |
− | #Reviewing Code for Logging Issues | + | #Reviewing Code for Error Handling - 100% |
− | #Reviewing The Secure Code Environment | + | #Reviewing Code for Logging Issues - 100% |
− | + | #Reviewing The Secure Code Environment - 100% | |
− | #Authorization | + | #Authorization (Currently linked to "The Development Guide") |
#Authentication (Code review) | #Authentication (Code review) | ||
#Session Integrity | #Session Integrity | ||
#Cross Site Request Forgery | #Cross Site Request Forgery | ||
− | #Cryptography | + | #Cryptography (Currently linked to "The Development Guide") |
− | #Dangerous HTTP Methods | + | #Dangerous HTTP Methods ( Secure deployment) |
#Race Conditions | #Race Conditions | ||
+ | |||
== Language specific best practice == | == Language specific best practice == | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
===.NET=== | ===.NET=== | ||
===PHP=== | ===PHP=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Assigned to Andrew van der Stock | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===MySQL=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Assigned to Andrew van der Stock | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===C/C++=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | # Memory management (Paolo Perego) | ||
+ | # String management (Paolo Perego) | ||
+ | # Secure access to file system items (Paolo Perego) | ||
==Automating Code Reviews== | ==Automating Code Reviews== | ||
Line 44: | Line 57: | ||
#Education and cultural change | #Education and cultural change | ||
#Tool Deployment Model | #Tool Deployment Model | ||
− | + | #Code Auditor Workbench Tool (100%) | |
==References== | ==References== |
Latest revision as of 11:17, 23 October 2007
Methodology
- Code Review Introduction
- Steps and Roles
- Code Review Processes
- Transaction Analysis - E Keary
Design review
- Designing for security
- - M Roxberry(.NET)
- - Paolo Perego (Java)
- - Andrew van der Stock (PHP)
- - Paolo Perego (C)
- - C++
- - Andrew van der Stock (MySQL)
- - Mallory (AJAX)
Examples by Vulnerability
- Reviewing Code for Buffer Overruns and Overflows - 100%
- Reviewing Code for OS Injection - 100%
- Reviewing Code for SQL Injection - 100%
- Reviewing Code for Data Validation - - 100%
- Reviewing code for XSS issues - 100%
- Reviewing Code for Error Handling - 100%
- Reviewing Code for Logging Issues - 100%
- Reviewing The Secure Code Environment - 100%
- Authorization (Currently linked to "The Development Guide")
- Authentication (Code review)
- Session Integrity
- Cross Site Request Forgery
- Cryptography (Currently linked to "The Development Guide")
- Dangerous HTTP Methods ( Secure deployment)
- Race Conditions
Language specific best practice
.NET
PHP
Assigned to Andrew van der Stock
MySQL
Assigned to Andrew van der Stock
C/C++
- Memory management (Paolo Perego)
- String management (Paolo Perego)
- Secure access to file system items (Paolo Perego)
Automating Code Reviews
- Preface
- Reasons for using automated tools
- Education and cultural change
- Tool Deployment Model
- Code Auditor Workbench Tool (100%)