This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Talk:OWASP Testing Project v2.0 - Review Guidelines"
Dinis.cruz (talk | contribs) |
Dinis.cruz (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Typos''' | '''Typos''' | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | '''12 Jan 2006''' | + | '''12 Jan 2006''': |
Hi all. I ´ ve been having a look at Owasp guide pages and contents, and I | Hi all. I ´ ve been having a look at Owasp guide pages and contents, and I | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
guide responsibles. | guide responsibles. | ||
| − | 18-Jan-2006 | + | '''18-Jan-2006:''' |
Dinis Cruz: Thanks for the comments, and you are correct about the dates. Regarding the Typos, if you see one, feel free to correct it | Dinis Cruz: Thanks for the comments, and you are correct about the dates. Regarding the Typos, if you see one, feel free to correct it | ||
Latest revision as of 15:12, 18 January 2007
Typos
12 Jan 2006:
Hi all. I ´ ve been having a look at Owasp guide pages and contents, and I have doubts because of typos or perhaps not completely well explained facts. In Dinis Cruz first announcement mail you can read:
The current plan is to create a 'published' version of this guide on the 10th of February which will be sent as a book to all OWASP members
But in that same email, the linked page that targets to reviewing guidelines, I found different dates to the email message. At first I read in [http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Project_v2.0_-_Review_Guidelines#Timelines timelines] section
# 11th January 2007: Review process begins # 11th January 2007: Review process ends
That I am almost completely secure it is wrong, and so I edited te page to put
February the 11th in the reviewing process end. But it keeps mismatching with
the time the email says, may you please address this issue? Thank you very
much.
I send a copy of this message both to wiki discussion page and email to the guide responsibles.
18-Jan-2006:
Dinis Cruz: Thanks for the comments, and you are correct about the dates. Regarding the Typos, if you see one, feel free to correct it
