This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "GPC/Meetings/2013-22-03"
From OWASP
(Created page with "__TOC__ = Project Division Updates = *'''[https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AllOCxlYdf1AdFdaYXJ6SDFXNXBaemNwbnNHN3N5RVE#gid=16 Project Numbers]''' **Ac...") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Currently Working On== | ==Currently Working On== | ||
| − | *''' | + | *'''OWASP Asia Leadership Outreach Project''' |
| − | **I | + | **This Asia Leadership Outreach Project came about during the discussion Dhillon and I had about OWASP at the Kuala Lumpur, Hack in the Box event. |
| − | ** | + | **He mentioned that he has offered OWASP a booth at the Kuala Lumpur, Hack in the Box event for a few years, but local chapters have not represented OWASP very well. |
| − | ** | + | **We suggested developing an OWASP Malaysia and Singapore outreach project that would involve a workshop, and the co-running of the Hack in the Box booth by members of both chapters. |
| − | ** | + | **I have put together a proposal where I outline a 3 day outreach initiative that aims to bring more experienced chapter leaders to the region for a workshop. |
| − | ** | + | **Read the [https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Projects/Asia_Leadership_Outreach_Proposal_2013 full proposal] for more information. |
| − | *''' | + | *'''Development of Technical Project Advisor Requirements''' |
| − | ** | + | **This item involves the new management work flow for project reviews that was proposed for 2013. |
| − | ** | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Projects/Reviews_Management_Proposal_2013 Projects Review Process Proposal] |
| − | ** | + | **It will involve a working group of technical project advisors headed by a member of the board. |
| − | ** | + | **The working group will be made up of the following areas: Secure Development, Secure Lifecycle Activity, Static Analysis, Dynamic Analysis, Governance, and Education. |
| + | **These roles will be responsible for reviewing projects, and increasing the quality of the project review process and criteria. | ||
| + | **I have put together experience requirements for each technical advisor volunteer role. | ||
| + | **To read the full descriptions, please visit the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zqDf9CJeCj-uE5kFA_DwkDbHWTQDI9NNPdxOpU-KTl4/edit?usp=sharing advisory role descriptions document]. | ||
| − | *'''OWASP | + | *'''Categorization of OWASP Projects''' |
| − | **I | + | **I have begun categorizing our OWASP projects into the Builder, Breaker, and Defender categories. |
| − | ** | + | **Currently, our categorization is limited so I have begun to increase the search criteria for our projects. |
| − | ** | + | **Additionally, I have begun to label our projects based on OWASP Open SAMM criteria. |
| − | ** | + | **The labels are as follows: Governance, Construction, Verification, Deployment. |
| + | **The plan is to allow users to find projects based on these labels on our projects wiki page. | ||
| − | *''' | + | *'''Project Leader Responsibilities & Expectations''' |
| − | ** | + | **I am currently working on putting together documentation that outlines a project leader's responsibilities, and our organizational expectations of them. |
| − | ** | + | **I am also developing a "How to run a successful OWASP project" document. |
| − | ** | + | **Jim and I are developing brand usage guidelines for our project leaders. |
| − | ** | + | **An OWASP project lifecycle info graphic is being developed as well. |
| − | ** | + | **I hope that these "How To" documents and graphics will help project leaders understand their responsibilities, and how to leverage the OWASP project infrastructure for success. |
| − | |||
*'''Daily Project based queries and requests''' | *'''Daily Project based queries and requests''' | ||
| Line 58: | Line 61: | ||
*'''Guidebooks Grant''' | *'''Guidebooks Grant''' | ||
#Amount: $25,000 | #Amount: $25,000 | ||
| − | #Status: We are still waiting for payment from DHS. | + | #Status: We are still waiting for payment from DHS. I have reached out to our DHS and Georgia Tech representatives once again to ask for payment. |
*'''ESAPI Proposal''' | *'''ESAPI Proposal''' | ||
Latest revision as of 20:22, 21 March 2013
Project Division Updates
- Project Numbers
- Active Projects: 139
- Inactive Projects: 67
- Projects Under Review
- Project Applications
- OWASP Top 10 fuer Entwickler
Currently Working On
- OWASP Asia Leadership Outreach Project
- This Asia Leadership Outreach Project came about during the discussion Dhillon and I had about OWASP at the Kuala Lumpur, Hack in the Box event.
- He mentioned that he has offered OWASP a booth at the Kuala Lumpur, Hack in the Box event for a few years, but local chapters have not represented OWASP very well.
- We suggested developing an OWASP Malaysia and Singapore outreach project that would involve a workshop, and the co-running of the Hack in the Box booth by members of both chapters.
- I have put together a proposal where I outline a 3 day outreach initiative that aims to bring more experienced chapter leaders to the region for a workshop.
- Read the full proposal for more information.
- Development of Technical Project Advisor Requirements
- This item involves the new management work flow for project reviews that was proposed for 2013.
- Projects Review Process Proposal
- It will involve a working group of technical project advisors headed by a member of the board.
- The working group will be made up of the following areas: Secure Development, Secure Lifecycle Activity, Static Analysis, Dynamic Analysis, Governance, and Education.
- These roles will be responsible for reviewing projects, and increasing the quality of the project review process and criteria.
- I have put together experience requirements for each technical advisor volunteer role.
- To read the full descriptions, please visit the advisory role descriptions document.
- Categorization of OWASP Projects
- I have begun categorizing our OWASP projects into the Builder, Breaker, and Defender categories.
- Currently, our categorization is limited so I have begun to increase the search criteria for our projects.
- Additionally, I have begun to label our projects based on OWASP Open SAMM criteria.
- The labels are as follows: Governance, Construction, Verification, Deployment.
- The plan is to allow users to find projects based on these labels on our projects wiki page.
- Project Leader Responsibilities & Expectations
- I am currently working on putting together documentation that outlines a project leader's responsibilities, and our organizational expectations of them.
- I am also developing a "How to run a successful OWASP project" document.
- Jim and I are developing brand usage guidelines for our project leaders.
- An OWASP project lifecycle info graphic is being developed as well.
- I hope that these "How To" documents and graphics will help project leaders understand their responsibilities, and how to leverage the OWASP project infrastructure for success.
- Daily Project based queries and requests
- This has not changed much since I began the post: questions are very similar in nature.
- Global AppSec questions.
- Funding queries.
- Travel availability.
- Project based administrative help.
- Project status information.
- Several project donations questions.
- OWASP LinkedIn Updates.
- What's happening with projects, questions.
Grants Updates
- Guidebooks Grant
- Amount: $25,000
- Status: We are still waiting for payment from DHS. I have reached out to our DHS and Georgia Tech representatives once again to ask for payment.
- ESAPI Proposal
- Amount: $25,000
- Status: The ESAPI proposal is still being reviewed.
- ModSecurity Grant Writing
- Amount: $30,000
- Status: The ModSecurity proposal is still being reviewed.
- Google Grants Proposal
- Amount: $120,00 in Adwords Funds
- Status: I have begun managing the Adwords account regularly. I am waiting until we reach the implementation phase with our marketing company.
- Total Grant Funds Awarded: $145,000 for 2013.