This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "OWASP Project Manager Activity Reports/March 11 2013"
From OWASP
(Created page with "== OWASP Project Manager Report == ==== Work accomplished since February 11, 2013 ==== *'''Project Numbers''' **Active Projects: 129 **Inactive Projects: 67 *'''New Incubat...") |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*'''Project Numbers''' | *'''Project Numbers''' | ||
| − | **Active Projects: | + | **Active Projects: 136 |
**Inactive Projects: 67 | **Inactive Projects: 67 | ||
*'''New Incubator Projects''' | *'''New Incubator Projects''' | ||
| − | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Dependency_Check OWASP Dependency Check] |
| − | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Scada_Security_Project OWASP Scada Security Project] |
| − | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Cornucopia OWASP Cornucopia] |
| − | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_PHPRBAC_Project OWASP PHPRBAC Project] |
| − | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Secure_Application_Design_Project OWASP Secure Application Design Project] |
| − | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Hive_Project OWASP Hive Project] | |
| − | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ | ||
| − | |||
*'''Project Announcements''' | *'''Project Announcements''' | ||
| − | **[ | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Periodic_Table_of_Vulnerabilities OWASP Periodic Table of Vulnerabilities Project: Working Group Forming]. |
| − | ** | + | **A working group is now forming under the leadership of James Landis to produce the 1.0 draft of the OWASP Periodic Table of Vulnerabilities. |
| − | ** | + | **The goal of this project is to identify the ideal solution target for known web application vulnerability classes as a first step toward eliminating many classes of vulnerabilities altogether. |
| − | + | **[https://code.google.com/p/owasp-igoat/ OWASP iGoat Project V.2.0 Released!]. | |
*'''Projects Under Review''' | *'''Projects Under Review''' | ||
| − | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Cheat_Sheets OWASP Cheat Sheets Project] | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Cheat_Sheets OWASP Cheat Sheets Project]: Test Reviewed. |
| − | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Java_HTML_Sanitizer_Project OWASP Java HTML Sanitizer Project] | + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Java_HTML_Sanitizer_Project OWASP Java HTML Sanitizer Project]: Test Reviewed. |
| + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Codes_of_Conduct OWASP Codes of Conduct]: Reviewing Under Legacy Process. | ||
| + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Xenotix_XSS_Exploit_Framework Xenotix XSS Exploit Framework]: New Review Submission. | ||
==Project Manager Q1 2013 Objectives== | ==Project Manager Q1 2013 Objectives== | ||
| − | #Continue grant funding research: Target $150 | + | #Continue grant funding research: Target $150,000 in 2013. ($5000 left to raise to reach target for 2013) |
| − | #Finalize and Implement New Project Infrastructure processes. | + | #Finalize and Implement New Project Infrastructure processes. (Ongoing) |
#Coordinate OSS and OWASP Track documentation, guidelines, and processes as they apply to Global AppSec Conferences. (Ongoing for 2013) | #Coordinate OSS and OWASP Track documentation, guidelines, and processes as they apply to Global AppSec Conferences. (Ongoing for 2013) | ||
| − | #Increase Sales Force use for project management. | + | #Increase Sales Force use for project management. (Ongoing) |
| − | #Complete and Launch Projects page. | + | #Complete and Launch Projects page. (Completed) |
| − | #Finalize the Project Leader Handbook. | + | #Finalize the Project Leader Handbook. (Completed) |
==Currently Working On== | ==Currently Working On== | ||
*'''Grant Opportunities Recap & Updates''' | *'''Grant Opportunities Recap & Updates''' | ||
| − | **Guidebooks Proposal: We are still waiting for the first payment. | + | **Guidebooks Proposal: We are still waiting for the first payment. DHS is currently reviewing their budgets for the year so their funds are frozen until then. |
**Amount: $25,000 | **Amount: $25,000 | ||
**ESAPI Proposal: This proposal is still under review. | **ESAPI Proposal: This proposal is still under review. | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
**Google Grants: We have been awarded this grant. Working on developing strategies to implement/use these funds. | **Google Grants: We have been awarded this grant. Working on developing strategies to implement/use these funds. | ||
**Amount: $120,000 a year in Google Adwords Money | **Amount: $120,000 a year in Google Adwords Money | ||
| − | **ModSecurity Proposal: This proposal is | + | **ModSecurity Proposal: This proposal is still under review. |
**Amount: $30,000 | **Amount: $30,000 | ||
**'''OWASP Static Analysis Tools Funding Opportunity: DHS''' | **'''OWASP Static Analysis Tools Funding Opportunity: DHS''' | ||
**There is a possibility of funding some of our Static Analysis tools. | **There is a possibility of funding some of our Static Analysis tools. | ||
| − | ** | + | **Kevin Greene is responsible for a different program than the DHS program that has already funded us. |
| − | **I | + | **Kevin and I plan to discuss the possibility of moving forward with a project once their budgets are released for the year. |
| − | *'''Total Grant Funds Awarded: $145,000 for 2013 so far.''' | + | *'''Total Grant Funds Awarded: $145,000 for 2013 so far.''' |
| + | |||
| + | *'''Project Reviews Process: Workflow Adjustment''' | ||
| + | **Testing of original Reviews Process developed in early 2013 produced quality concerns. | ||
| + | **I developed a new management work flow with Jim Manico's assistance. | ||
| + | **It will involve a working group of technical project advisors headed by a member of the board. | ||
| + | **I feel this person should be, Jim Manico, as he has shown great dedication and support to our projects overall. (Lead Technical Project Advisor). | ||
| + | **The working group should be made up of the following areas: Secure Development, Secure Lifecycle Activity, Static Analysis, Dynamic Analysis, Governance, and Knowledge. | ||
| + | **Each of these areas should be a project division role filled by one individual. | ||
| + | **Each role will have a six month limit, or the individual can resign the post if he/she can no longer fulfill the role's duties. | ||
| + | **These roles will be responsible for reviewing projects, and increasing the quality of the project review process and criteria. | ||
| + | **This working group will be managed by the Lead Technical Project Advisor with updates and outcomes reported to the OWASP PM. | ||
| + | **[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Projects/Reviews_Management_Proposal_2013 Projects Review Process Proposal] | ||
| − | *''' | + | *'''AppSec USA: OPT &OSS''' |
| − | ** | + | **We are developing two different event modules for AppSec USA. |
| − | ** | + | **OPT: This event module will be omitted for AppSec USA. |
| − | **I | + | **OSS: This event module will be altered to include a full day of 30 minute, presentation like demos. |
| + | **Mini Project Working Groups: This event module will be developed for this conference. The idea is to coordinate working groups for a hand full of projects at the conference. | ||
| + | **Project Leader Workshop: I will put together and run the Project Leader Workshop at AppSec USA. | ||
| − | *''' | + | *'''AppSec EU Research: OPT &OSS''' |
| − | ** | + | **I started creating documents for the AppSec EU Research Open Source Showcase and OWASP Projects Track. |
| − | ** | + | **[https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDMwck9VZC1ieWluekdsbUVFZGhGMnc6MA#gid=0 AppSec EU Research OPT Form.] |
| + | **[https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGhkUUhkeDBWOVZPcVdzcWloYWhla3c6MA#gid=0 AppSec EU Research OSS Form.] | ||
| + | **[https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/document/d/1dOrUYtwlBXwfhPyZa9JYqV1MeUUjSxvjm5mwgMqJXhE/edit AppSec EU Research Projects Document.] | ||
| + | **I am waiting to hear from the local conference organizers on how they wish to proceed with this event module. | ||
| − | *''' | + | *'''Black Hat EU''' |
| − | ** | + | **I am scheduled to attend Black Hat EU this week. |
| − | ** | + | **I am helping manage our OWASP Booth for two days. |
| − | ** | + | **Goal: Familiarize myself with Black Hat event management, branding, activities. |
| − | ** | + | **Martin Knobloch and Ferdinand Vroom are scheduled to volunteer as well. |
| − | ** | + | **I will be attending the Netherlands Chapter Meeting during the conference as well. |
| − | *''' | + | *'''OWASP Marketing''' |
| − | ** | + | **I am taking a more active role in OWASP's Global Marketing Initiatives. |
| − | ** | + | **The next initiatives meeting will involve the Marketing Company we are currently working with. |
| − | ** | + | **They will present their Phase 1 research findings to the entire community. |
| − | + | **Goal: To develop a marketing and brand strategy for the organization. | |
| − | + | **I will coordinate Phase 3 & 4 of our Marketing Initiatives. | |
| − | ** | ||
| − | ** | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Important Projects Division Outcomes and Discussion Points== | ==Important Projects Division Outcomes and Discussion Points== | ||
| − | #[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/GPC/Meetings/2013- | + | #[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/GPC/Meetings/2013-15-02 GPC Meeting: February 15 2013 Project Manager Report] |
| − | #[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/GPC/Meetings/2013- | + | #[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/GPC/Meetings/2013-22-02 GPC Meeting: February 22 2013 Project Manager Report] |
| − | #[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/GPC/Meetings/2013-01- | + | #[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/GPC/Meetings/2013-01-03 Project Manager Report: March 01 2013] |
| − | #[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/GPC/Meetings/2013-08- | + | #[https://www.owasp.org/index.php/GPC/Meetings/2013-08-03 Project Manager Report: March 08 2013] |
| − | # | + | #I will have a projects meeting each month that will be open to all the OWASP community starting in April. |
| − | + | #I continue to developing a template, visual branding, and review criteria to meet our project identification needs as I feel this is a very important distinction to make between our projects. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | #I continue to developing a template, visual branding, and review criteria to meet | ||
Latest revision as of 15:21, 11 March 2013
OWASP Project Manager Report
Work accomplished since February 11, 2013
- Project Numbers
- Active Projects: 136
- Inactive Projects: 67
- New Incubator Projects
- Project Announcements
- OWASP Periodic Table of Vulnerabilities Project: Working Group Forming.
- A working group is now forming under the leadership of James Landis to produce the 1.0 draft of the OWASP Periodic Table of Vulnerabilities.
- The goal of this project is to identify the ideal solution target for known web application vulnerability classes as a first step toward eliminating many classes of vulnerabilities altogether.
- OWASP iGoat Project V.2.0 Released!.
- Projects Under Review
- OWASP Cheat Sheets Project: Test Reviewed.
- OWASP Java HTML Sanitizer Project: Test Reviewed.
- OWASP Codes of Conduct: Reviewing Under Legacy Process.
- Xenotix XSS Exploit Framework: New Review Submission.
Project Manager Q1 2013 Objectives
- Continue grant funding research: Target $150,000 in 2013. ($5000 left to raise to reach target for 2013)
- Finalize and Implement New Project Infrastructure processes. (Ongoing)
- Coordinate OSS and OWASP Track documentation, guidelines, and processes as they apply to Global AppSec Conferences. (Ongoing for 2013)
- Increase Sales Force use for project management. (Ongoing)
- Complete and Launch Projects page. (Completed)
- Finalize the Project Leader Handbook. (Completed)
Currently Working On
- Grant Opportunities Recap & Updates
- Guidebooks Proposal: We are still waiting for the first payment. DHS is currently reviewing their budgets for the year so their funds are frozen until then.
- Amount: $25,000
- ESAPI Proposal: This proposal is still under review.
- Amount: $25,000
- Google Grants: We have been awarded this grant. Working on developing strategies to implement/use these funds.
- Amount: $120,000 a year in Google Adwords Money
- ModSecurity Proposal: This proposal is still under review.
- Amount: $30,000
- OWASP Static Analysis Tools Funding Opportunity: DHS
- There is a possibility of funding some of our Static Analysis tools.
- Kevin Greene is responsible for a different program than the DHS program that has already funded us.
- Kevin and I plan to discuss the possibility of moving forward with a project once their budgets are released for the year.
- Total Grant Funds Awarded: $145,000 for 2013 so far.
- Project Reviews Process: Workflow Adjustment
- Testing of original Reviews Process developed in early 2013 produced quality concerns.
- I developed a new management work flow with Jim Manico's assistance.
- It will involve a working group of technical project advisors headed by a member of the board.
- I feel this person should be, Jim Manico, as he has shown great dedication and support to our projects overall. (Lead Technical Project Advisor).
- The working group should be made up of the following areas: Secure Development, Secure Lifecycle Activity, Static Analysis, Dynamic Analysis, Governance, and Knowledge.
- Each of these areas should be a project division role filled by one individual.
- Each role will have a six month limit, or the individual can resign the post if he/she can no longer fulfill the role's duties.
- These roles will be responsible for reviewing projects, and increasing the quality of the project review process and criteria.
- This working group will be managed by the Lead Technical Project Advisor with updates and outcomes reported to the OWASP PM.
- Projects Review Process Proposal
- AppSec USA: OPT &OSS
- We are developing two different event modules for AppSec USA.
- OPT: This event module will be omitted for AppSec USA.
- OSS: This event module will be altered to include a full day of 30 minute, presentation like demos.
- Mini Project Working Groups: This event module will be developed for this conference. The idea is to coordinate working groups for a hand full of projects at the conference.
- Project Leader Workshop: I will put together and run the Project Leader Workshop at AppSec USA.
- AppSec EU Research: OPT &OSS
- I started creating documents for the AppSec EU Research Open Source Showcase and OWASP Projects Track.
- AppSec EU Research OPT Form.
- AppSec EU Research OSS Form.
- AppSec EU Research Projects Document.
- I am waiting to hear from the local conference organizers on how they wish to proceed with this event module.
- Black Hat EU
- I am scheduled to attend Black Hat EU this week.
- I am helping manage our OWASP Booth for two days.
- Goal: Familiarize myself with Black Hat event management, branding, activities.
- Martin Knobloch and Ferdinand Vroom are scheduled to volunteer as well.
- I will be attending the Netherlands Chapter Meeting during the conference as well.
- OWASP Marketing
- I am taking a more active role in OWASP's Global Marketing Initiatives.
- The next initiatives meeting will involve the Marketing Company we are currently working with.
- They will present their Phase 1 research findings to the entire community.
- Goal: To develop a marketing and brand strategy for the organization.
- I will coordinate Phase 3 & 4 of our Marketing Initiatives.
Important Projects Division Outcomes and Discussion Points
- GPC Meeting: February 15 2013 Project Manager Report
- GPC Meeting: February 22 2013 Project Manager Report
- Project Manager Report: March 01 2013
- Project Manager Report: March 08 2013
- I will have a projects meeting each month that will be open to all the OWASP community starting in April.
- I continue to developing a template, visual branding, and review criteria to meet our project identification needs as I feel this is a very important distinction to make between our projects.