Project Information:template ASDR Project - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I
Project Deliveries & Objectives	OWASP Application Security Desk Reference (ASDR) Project's Deliveries & Objectives
QUESTIONS	ANSWERS
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.	It's was not possible to develop and review all articles from the guide. Only 40 articles were developed /reviewed.
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.	Except by articles development/review and considering all the work (templates definition, 2 new categories created, draft book compilation, definition of subcategories for each category in order to define a taxonomy) and despite my underestimation of work when I applied to SoC, I believe the project reached 80%. Also, another task that wasn't defined in the proposal was made. All articles (+600) were filtered out and merged when suitable, thus making 303 articles tagged to be deleted. The current number of articles in ASDR is 357, which already had been put in template structure.
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?	Identify some more focused volunteers to develop and review articles contents in order to raise their quality.
PART II
Assessment Criteria	OWASP Project Assessment Criteria
QUESTIONS	ANSWERS
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?	All requirements were accomplished, except by revision phase. One of the reviewers (Darren Challey) started to review the first 30 pages, even though it was not completed.
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?	Reference guide is a continuous project that needs lots of support from community. I expect to receive this support in next Season of Quality in order to keep its development until we have everything consolidated and a first Quality Release version.