This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Project Information:template .NET Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
The project has produced valueable resources for secure .NET development and security awareness.
It needs a press release to create awareness. - I agree with these statements and that it needs to be looked after so it does not go out of date. Also, I agree that this information can get "stale" relatively quickly but at this time I am not sure how to accomplish this without assigning to an individual. I think is was overdue and glad that the project has been successful at creating a useful structure for aggregating data into a single source on the OWASP site. | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
100% | |
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
As mentioned such an informational project needs constant care and attention. It also needs a team behind it. - agree
I look forward to seeing this project expand to include future releases of development environments such as Silverlight. | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
Yes | |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
Yes | |
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
Yes. Section "Areas of Concern" seems to need some work? https://www.owasp.org/index.php/.NET_Security_for_Developers - agree | |
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Would like to see going forward integration with the other OWASP guides; Code review, Development etc - agree and It would be nice to have a consistent presentation of the information as well|
|