This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Using a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Template:Vulnerability}}
 
{{Template:SecureSoftware}}
 
{{Template:SecureSoftware}}
{{Template:Vulnerability}}
 
  
[[Category:FIXME|This is the text from the old template. This needs to be rewritten using the new template.]]
+
__TOC__
 +
 
 +
[[ASDR Table of Contents]]
  
  
 
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}'''
 
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}'''
  
[[ASDR_TOC_Vulnerabilities|Vulnerabilities Table of Contents]]
+
[[Category:FIXME|This is the text from the old template. This needs to be rewritten using the new template.]]
 
 
[[ASDR Table of Contents]]
 
__TOC__
 
  
  

Revision as of 17:31, 9 November 2008

This is a Vulnerability. To view all vulnerabilities, please see the Vulnerability Category page.


ASDR Table of Contents


Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 11/9/2008


Description

The use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm is an unnecessary risk that may result in the disclosure of sensitive information.

Consequences

  • Confidentiality: The confidentiality of sensitive data may be compromised by the use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm.
  • Integrity: The integrity of sensitive data may be compromised by the use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm.
  • Accountability: Any accountability to message content preserved by cryptography may be subject to attack.

Exposure period

  • Design: The decision as to what cryptographic algorithm to utilize is generally made at design time.

Platform

  • Languages: All
  • Operating platforms: All

Required resources

Any

Severity

High

Likelihood of exploit

Medium to High

Since the state of cryptography advances so rapidly, it is common to find algorithms, which previously were considered to be safe, currently considered unsafe. In some cases, things are discovered, or processing speed increases to the degree that the cryptographic algorithm provides little more benefit than the use of no cryptography at all.


Risk Factors

TBD


Examples

In C/C++:

EVP_des_ecb();

In Java:

Cipher des=Cipher.getInstance("DES...);
des.initEncrypt(key2);


Related Attacks


Related Vulnerabilities


Related Controls

  • Design: Use a cryptographic algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field.


Related Technical Impacts


References

TBD