This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Source Code Review OWASP Projects - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
− | + | All Beta criteria are fulfilled. | |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
− | + | The OWASP EU Summit presentation has been uploaded to fulfill that requirement. | |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| |
Latest revision as of 19:09, 19 December 2008
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
OWASP Source Code Review OWASP-Projects Project's Deliveries & Objectives | |
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
The major project objectives have been accomplished:
| |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
We spent the time since the project midpoint submitting projects to the owasp.fortify.com site. The current status of tasks is:
| |
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |
||
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
All Alpha criteria are fulfilled. | |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
All Beta criteria are fulfilled. | |
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
The OWASP EU Summit presentation has been uploaded to fulfill that requirement. | |
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |
To ensure that this project leads to continuing improvement in the security of OWASP projects, we need more OWASP project leaders to incorporate static analysis into their project's software development lifecycle. We have received only one volunteer who was willing to take the time to incorporate static analysis into his project: Yiannis, project leader of the JBroFuzz project. We can analyze OWASP projects on our own, but it's important to include static analysis as part of the lifecycle. |