This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:Sqlibench - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="background:#4058A0; col...) |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#SQL_Injector_Benchmarking_Project_.28SQLiBENCH.29|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | 1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#SQL_Injector_Benchmarking_Project_.28SQLiBENCH.29|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
+ | |||
+ | %90 of the overall deliverables are finished. The three unfinished jobs we have are; creating videos of the preparing the environment (nevertheless written documentation has been produced), integrating the vulnerable application into OWASP Site Generator, (we won't pursue this) and lastly, writing webscarab-beanshell scripts for exploitation (instead we have created a howto document explaining the testing methodology for other benchmarkers, inclusing example runs of sqlmap) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Additional to the %50 review deliverables, here are other deliverables adding upto the %100 review; | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. xml benchmarking report (http://sqlibench.googlecode.com/files/sqlibench_v2.1.xml) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. tabular pdf benchmarking report (http://sqlibench.googlecode.com/files/sqlibench_matrix_v2.pdf). | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. updated interactive web application (http://www.webguvenligi.org/sqlibench/web/index.php) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. benchmarker life saver document (http://code.google.com/p/sqlibench/wiki/HowToBenchmark) | ||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| |
Revision as of 09:37, 28 September 2008
.
50% REVIEW PROCESS | ||
---|---|---|
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
%90 of the overall deliverables are finished. The three unfinished jobs we have are; creating videos of the preparing the environment (nevertheless written documentation has been produced), integrating the vulnerable application into OWASP Site Generator, (we won't pursue this) and lastly, writing webscarab-beanshell scripts for exploitation (instead we have created a howto document explaining the testing methodology for other benchmarkers, inclusing example runs of sqlmap) Additional to the %50 review deliverables, here are other deliverables adding upto the %100 review; 1. xml benchmarking report (http://sqlibench.googlecode.com/files/sqlibench_v2.1.xml) 2. tabular pdf benchmarking report (http://sqlibench.googlecode.com/files/sqlibench_matrix_v2.pdf). 3. updated interactive web application (http://www.webguvenligi.org/sqlibench/web/index.php) 4. benchmarker life saver document (http://code.google.com/p/sqlibench/wiki/HowToBenchmark) | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
||
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |
||
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
||
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
||
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
||
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |