This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Polls"
(→Past polls) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== ''' Current Poll(s)''' == | == ''' Current Poll(s)''' == | ||
+ | * [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/forms/d/1avUXeHi--oWXoHNhTOLN6jIIIHZ6obBnzFZMYHz03B4/viewform?usp=send_form Do you think that OWASP board candidates should be announced prior to the 'Call for Candidates' deadline?] | ||
+ | * [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/spreadsheets/d/1TSGRicIIRa3Bpq76xItr9jsrDEcOlim0an8pKdqNuTQ/edit#gid=756931375 Interim results] | ||
+ | * Date started: 2014 July 17 | ||
+ | * Proposed close date: July 24 | ||
+ | * Author: [[User:Simon Bennetts|Simon Bennetts]] | ||
Line 24: | Line 29: | ||
! Should OWASP allow other options in addition to the current training model? | ! Should OWASP allow other options in addition to the current training model? | ||
! # votes | ! # votes | ||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| No, please leave it as is. | | No, please leave it as is. | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to donate their 40% of the proceedings to the OWASP Foundation and/or an OWASP project/chapter of choice. | | Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to donate their 40% of the proceedings to the OWASP Foundation and/or an OWASP project/chapter of choice. | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to receive travel expenses as their sole compensation and the remaining proceedings will go to the OWASP Foundation. | | Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to receive travel expenses as their sole compensation and the remaining proceedings will go to the OWASP Foundation. | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to deliver their trainings for free at major OWASP conferences. | | Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to deliver their trainings for free at major OWASP conferences. | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:00, 17 July 2014
OWASP Polls are a way of getting the 'pulse' of the OWASP community - they should not be considered 'binding'.
They may be about any subject that people feel may be of interest to the OWASP community.
All polls require an Owasp.org email_address and will publish full details of the responses.
If you ask for the form to be shared with you from a non OWASP address then you will just get a canned response explaining why this will not currently happen.
To add a poll please contact Simon Bennetts
Current Poll(s)
- Do you think that OWASP board candidates should be announced prior to the 'Call for Candidates' deadline?
- Interim results
- Date started: 2014 July 17
- Proposed close date: July 24
- Author: Simon Bennetts
Note that only OWASP members can see the 'live' results and the statement before its release. A summary of the results will be made public when the poll closes, but the full details will stay restricted to OWASP members to prevent email harvesting.
Past polls
- OWASP Training Contract
- Final results
Should OWASP allow other options in addition to the current training model? | # votes |
---|---|
No, please leave it as is. | 2 |
Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to donate their 40% of the proceedings to the OWASP Foundation and/or an OWASP project/chapter of choice. | 8 |
Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to receive travel expenses as their sole compensation and the remaining proceedings will go to the OWASP Foundation. | 8 |
Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to deliver their trainings for free at major OWASP conferences. | 6 |
- Date started: 19 Feb 2014
- Date closed: 22 Feb 2014
- Author: Fabio Cerullo
- Is it acceptable for organizations to place restrictions on OWASP presenting any material at any other events?
- Final results
Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference? | # votes | % |
---|---|---|
Yes, commercial organizations make these decisions to protect and add value to their events, if we want to present at them we should abide by their rules | 0 | 0% |
Yes, as above, but only under exceptional circumstances and it should require an OWASP board vote | 3 | 10% |
No, we should never accept any such restrictions | 27 | 87% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
- Date started: 2014 Jan 9
- Date closed: Jan 29
- Author: Simon Bennetts
- Should OWASP give developer training at RSA?
Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference? | # votes | % |
---|---|---|
Yes, this should be an official OWASP initiative | 31 | 43% |
No, OWASP should publicly pull out | 25 | 35% |
Yes, as long as the training is given as individuals an not an official OWASP initiative | 8 | 11% |
The board should decide | 7 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Should OWASP make a public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea | # votes | % |
Yes | 67 | 93% |
No | 5 | 7% |
- Full results
- Date started: 2014 Jan 7
- Date closed: 2014 Jan 15
- Author: Simon Bennetts
- Do you support OWASP to make the following public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea?
The text of the statement is here: [1]
Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference? | # votes | % |
---|---|---|
Yes, we shall release it | 30 | 100% |
No, we shall not release it | 0 | 0% |
- Full results
- Date started: 2014 Jan 23
- Proposed close date: Jan 27 14:00 CST
- Author: Tobias Gondrom