This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "GPTC Agenda 20 Jan 2009"
From OWASP
m (→Agenda for Global Projects & Tools Committee on 20 Jan 2009) |
m |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Agenda for Global Projects & Tools Committee on 20 Jan 2009 == | == Agenda for Global Projects & Tools Committee on 20 Jan 2009 == | ||
− | * Membership Committee had a written proposal that was approved by the Board and is now being implemented. http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Membership how can the adjustment be of value for Global Tools (heheh) | + | Old Business |
+ | ** A follow-up on what was done over the results from our first and second meetings. | ||
+ | |||
+ | New Business | ||
+ | * Establish a Idea Catcher to track the results of the meetings and publish them to the wiki for the next meeting. | ||
+ | * Establish the dates/times for monthly committee meetings (skype/conf. call other...) | ||
+ | * Membership Committee had a written proposal that was approved by the Board and is now being implemented. http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Membership how can the adjustment be of value for Global Tools (heheh) and should "Supporters" be able to sponsor projects? | ||
+ | * Does everyone agree with this process? http://www.owasp.org/index.php/How_to_Start_an_OWASP_Project | ||
+ | ** How does it change if someone has a existing project and wants to "Donate" it to OWASP Foundation? | ||
* Items from Paulo's list here: http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dcn8962c_24g648x5d3 | * Items from Paulo's list here: http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dcn8962c_24g648x5d3 | ||
** Is the New “streamlined” table approved? Are there any recommendations? | ** Is the New “streamlined” table approved? Are there any recommendations? | ||
Line 7: | Line 15: | ||
** Can the reviewers role definition be improved? Shouldn't it be linked to the assessment criteria? How? | ** Can the reviewers role definition be improved? Shouldn't it be linked to the assessment criteria? How? | ||
*** http://owaspsoc2008.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/assessment-guidance/ | *** http://owaspsoc2008.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/assessment-guidance/ | ||
− | + | ||
** We need to set up as as possible a new season of code. How will it be done? | ** We need to set up as as possible a new season of code. How will it be done? | ||
** New projects waiting for Committee's response: | ** New projects waiting for Committee's response: | ||
Line 18: | Line 26: | ||
* Closure of Summer Of Code 2008 http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Summer_of_Code_2008 | * Closure of Summer Of Code 2008 http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Summer_of_Code_2008 | ||
* Boaz Gelbord's https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Security_Spending_Benchmarks - Paulo's involvement and will be used by the Global Industry Committee to collect stats. | * Boaz Gelbord's https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Security_Spending_Benchmarks - Paulo's involvement and will be used by the Global Industry Committee to collect stats. | ||
+ | ** Can a set of criterion be established to define OWASP priorities in terms of projects available to be sponsored by our OWASP Members? | ||
* Discuss new project creation process: Paulos has directed many new project e-mails for our list and I think we should prioritize our tasks in order to make those projects start correctly. In this sense, integration activities should be prioritized. | * Discuss new project creation process: Paulos has directed many new project e-mails for our list and I think we should prioritize our tasks in order to make those projects start correctly. In this sense, integration activities should be prioritized. | ||
** Projects moving to release quality: | ** Projects moving to release quality: | ||
*** Anti-Sammy for Java | *** Anti-Sammy for Java | ||
** Identfify the list of projects that shall be sponsored by for 2009 - should we consider having one season of quality/cleaning and one season of code? | ** Identfify the list of projects that shall be sponsored by for 2009 - should we consider having one season of quality/cleaning and one season of code? | ||
− | + | ||
*** discuss a proper operational/coordination workflow | *** discuss a proper operational/coordination workflow | ||
− | + | [[Category:GPC Meetings]] |
Latest revision as of 17:15, 17 March 2009
Agenda for Global Projects & Tools Committee on 20 Jan 2009
Old Business
- A follow-up on what was done over the results from our first and second meetings.
New Business
- Establish a Idea Catcher to track the results of the meetings and publish them to the wiki for the next meeting.
- Establish the dates/times for monthly committee meetings (skype/conf. call other...)
- Membership Committee had a written proposal that was approved by the Board and is now being implemented. http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Membership how can the adjustment be of value for Global Tools (heheh) and should "Supporters" be able to sponsor projects?
- Does everyone agree with this process? http://www.owasp.org/index.php/How_to_Start_an_OWASP_Project
- How does it change if someone has a existing project and wants to "Donate" it to OWASP Foundation?
- Items from Paulo's list here: http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dcn8962c_24g648x5d3
- Is the New “streamlined” table approved? Are there any recommendations?
- Dave has asked for a google sheet to deal with the assessment criteria. I suppose the goal is to make the assessment process easier. Should it be linked with the new “streamlined” table? How? (http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pAX6n7m2zaTW-JtGBqixbTw)
- Can the reviewers role definition be improved? Shouldn't it be linked to the assessment criteria? How?
- We need to set up as as possible a new season of code. How will it be done?
- New projects waiting for Committee's response:
- Owasp Anti-Malware Project: Defending Web Infrastructures Against Malware' project - Giorgio Fedon, See Appendant (2).
- Owasp project for VICNUM, Mordecai Kraushar, See Appendant (3).
- New OWASP Project for SAMM, Pravir Chandra, See Appendant (4)
- Web Application Harvesting, Esteban Ribičić, See Appendant (5)
- Process for approving OWASP projects. Is there any? should have?
- Andrew's Grant proposal request: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/2009-January/000823.html
- Closure of Summer Of Code 2008 http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Summer_of_Code_2008
- Boaz Gelbord's https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Security_Spending_Benchmarks - Paulo's involvement and will be used by the Global Industry Committee to collect stats.
- Can a set of criterion be established to define OWASP priorities in terms of projects available to be sponsored by our OWASP Members?
- Discuss new project creation process: Paulos has directed many new project e-mails for our list and I think we should prioritize our tasks in order to make those projects start correctly. In this sense, integration activities should be prioritized.
- Projects moving to release quality:
- Anti-Sammy for Java
- Identfify the list of projects that shall be sponsored by for 2009 - should we consider having one season of quality/cleaning and one season of code?
- Projects moving to release quality:
- discuss a proper operational/coordination workflow