This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2010-01-04"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Current Meeting)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
== Current Meeting  ==
 
== Current Meeting  ==
 
+
*Do we have a new Board Rep? If so, whom from our two additional board members are staying on? How does that work?
 
*Discussion of 2009's achievements and Action Plan for 2010.
 
*Discussion of 2009's achievements and Action Plan for 2010.
 
*The [[:Category:OWASP Top Ten Project|'''OWASP Top Ten Project''']]'s project leader has invited M. Boberski to review the project against the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0|assessment criteria 2.0]].  
 
*The [[:Category:OWASP Top Ten Project|'''OWASP Top Ten Project''']]'s project leader has invited M. Boberski to review the project against the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0|assessment criteria 2.0]].  

Revision as of 17:06, 4 January 2010

Previous meetings and Dial-in details

see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda and the Dial-In details

Agenda

Current Meeting

  • Do we have a new Board Rep? If so, whom from our two additional board members are staying on? How does that work?
  • Discussion of 2009's achievements and Action Plan for 2010.
  • The OWASP Top Ten Project's project leader has invited M. Boberski to review the project against the assessment criteria 2.0.
    • As a result, M. Boberski has raised a set of questions about the criteria. Please see them here.
    • Dinis has built a FAQ wiki page to answer M.and to more broadly make our responses available for future assessment criteria's users. The FAQ wiki page can be accessed here.
    • Please find the spare cycles to help to answer the above referred questions.

  • Regarding the creation of covers for OWASP Books, Brad proposes we move the process to a volunteer, without buying the source files.

From Previous Meeting/Follow up

  • Reviewers Drive:
    • Brad's Post,
    • Next phase?
      • Maybe the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.

Issues for next Meeting

  • Add here

Minutes

  • Meeting started 10H PM/GMT
  • Add here