This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Project Information:template Backend Security Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
The goals of the project have been met with the delivered content. | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
100% | |
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
The overall content is great. I think that the wiki and the pdf could use more formatting. With the Content section of the wiki it would be nice to have a link to each subsection. This is mainly because as the document grows it will become required for easy navigation. The PDF needs two things. The first is a clickable index like in documents created with PDF writer. The second is code boxing. This is where people put boxes/outlines around code which makes it easier to read. | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
All Alpha quality criteria have been met except for the mailing list. This may be in place and I am just unaware of it. If this is so, then there should be a link on the project page for people to join so that they are also aware that they can get updates on the project. | |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
This document meets the Beta Quality criteria | |
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
This project does not meet Release quality standards set forth by OWASP. | |
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Great job on the project. It has very good interlinking to other OWASP documents which makes research easy. |