This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
GPC Agenda 2009-05-01
From OWASP
Agenda
Meeting started 2100 GMT
- Determine exit criteria for SoC
- Determine "core criteria" for projects (assessment frame)
- Determine nomenclature for L0/L1/L2 for projects and L1/L2/L3 for releases
- Discuss entrance criteria to L2 for projects (if time permits)
- Present "Project Health" proposal:
- Define project "health" characteristics (e.g., frequency of releases, adoption rate, etc)
- Entrance criteria into L2 is 50% of the "health" characteristics
- Entrance criteria into L3 is 100% of the "health" characteristics (or board/GPC discretion?)
- In general, projects will not backslide from L2 to L1 or L1 to L0; projects will move in and out of L3
- Present "Project Health" proposal:
- Discuss entrance criteria for "archived" projects (if time permits)
Meeting ended 2130 GMT
Minutes
- Agreed on Project Health Proposal
- Agreed on Alpha, Beta, Stable designations for releases
- Agreed that we should impose a naming convention for releases to prevent confusion between version numbers and assessment criteria rating (e.g., v1.203-beta for an Alpha quality release)
- Agreed that "Level X" servers as appropriate nomenclature for Project Health
- Agreed that projects can backslide from Level 2 to Level 1
Action Items
- Jason will summarize survey results and present at Monday's meeting