This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Code Review Preparation"
(Discussion topic moved here from the article where the content came from, too) |
(Added notification that the discussion topic has been addressed.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
One further thought: if it's supposed to be "availability", it may be valuable to add discussion of integrity and confidentiality, as well. | One further thought: if it's supposed to be "availability", it may be valuable to add discussion of integrity and confidentiality, as well. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Thank you for pointing it out, it has now been addressed in revision oldid=88937. --[[User:Thomas Herlea|Thomas Herlea]] 15:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:03, 9 September 2010
In Discovery: Gathering the information, under before we start, number 4. Does this *really* mean "importance"? It's possible for a very important system to be unavailable most of the time (i.e. a root cert server might be shut down, when not actually needed, and have not network connectivity, making it unavailable except for a local console). The description is of availability, not "importance".
If it's supposed to be about availability, then it should prolly be renamed. If it's about "importance", then "importance" needs to be clearly defined. --Atk 13:55, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
One further thought: if it's supposed to be "availability", it may be valuable to add discussion of integrity and confidentiality, as well.
- Thank you for pointing it out, it has now been addressed in revision oldid=88937. --Thomas Herlea 15:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
