This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Teachable Static Analysis Workbench - Final Review - First Reviewer - D"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 28: Line 28:
 
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
 
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
−
# There should be some clarification on the Wiki for what must be done to merely install and use the tool(s). For example, the "InstallGuide" is then followed by "BuildingFromSource". Does a normal user of TSAW need to build from source?
+
# There could be a "How To" document that describes how to write additional analyzers for the project. If not, then a "Lessons Learned" for security analysts or developers who want to extend the project on their own, but could use your insight from building the first analyzer.
−
#
 
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
Line 50: Line 49:
 
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
 
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
Add a common About Box.
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
One-click build, Fortify Software's open source review and FindBugs.
 
  |-   
 
  |-   
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
 
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
I think the future versions should
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 22:18, 3 November 2008

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Teachable Static Analysis Workbench Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

Input Validation functionality works as stated.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

The promised deliverables and functionality have been completed 100%.

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

  1. There could be a "How To" document that describes how to write additional analyzers for the project. If not, then a "Lessons Learned" for security analysts or developers who want to extend the project on their own, but could use your insight from building the first analyzer.
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

None.

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

Add a common About Box.

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

One-click build, Fortify Software's open source review and FindBugs.

4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

I think the future versions should

Retrieved from "https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=Project_Information:template_Teachable_Static_Analysis_Workbench_-_Final_Review_-_First_Reviewer_-_D&oldid=45676"