This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Category:OWASP Top Ten Project"
m |
m |
||
Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
==Project Sponsors== | ==Project Sponsors== | ||
− | [http://www.aspectsecurity.com | + | The OWASP Top Ten project is sponsored by |
− | + | [http://www.aspectsecurity.com http://www.owasp.org/docroot/owasp/img/members/aspect_logo.gif] | |
− | |||
[[Category:OWASP Project]] | [[Category:OWASP Project]] | ||
[[Category:OWASP Document]] | [[Category:OWASP Document]] | ||
[[Category:OWASP Download]] | [[Category:OWASP Download]] |
Revision as of 06:01, 30 May 2006
Welcome to the OWASP Top Ten Project
The OWASP Top Ten provides a minimum standard for web application security. The OWASP Top Ten represents a broad consensus about what the most critical web application security flaws are. Project members include a variety of security experts from around the world who have shared their expertise to produce this list. There are currently versions in English, French, Japanese, and Korean. A Spanish version is in the works. We urge all companies to adopt the standard within their organization and start the process of ensuring that their web applications do not contain these flaws. Adopting the OWASP Top Ten is perhaps the most effective first step towards changing the software development culture within your organization into one that produces secure code.
Versions
Browse online
Download
- Chinese
- English
- French
- Italian
- Japanese
- Spanish
Top Ten Overview
The following list summarizes the OWASP Top Ten. However, we strongly recommend reading the full report, as each area covers quite a lot of ground.
- A1 Unvalidated Input
- Information from web requests is not validated before being used by a web application. Attackers can use these flaws to attack backend components through a web application.
- A2 Broken Access Control
- Restrictions on what authenticated users are allowed to do are not properly enforced. Attackers can exploit these flaws to access other users' accounts, view sensitive files, or use unauthorized functions.
- A3 Broken Authentication and Session Management
- Account credentials and session tokens are not properly protected. Attackers that can compromise passwords, keys, session cookies, or other tokens can defeat authentication restrictions and assume other users' identities.
- A4 Cross Site Scripting
- The web application can be used as a mechanism to transport an attack to an end user's browser. A successful attack can disclose the end user?s session token, attack the local machine, or spoof content to fool the user.
- A5 Buffer Overflow
- Web application components in some languages that do not properly validate input can be crashed and, in some cases, used to take control of a process. These components can include CGI, libraries, drivers, and web application server components.
- A6 Injection Flaws
- Web applications pass parameters when they access external systems or the local operating system. If an attacker can embed malicious commands in these parameters, the external system may execute those commands on behalf of the web application.
- A7 Improper Error Handling
- Error conditions that occur during normal operation are not handled properly. If an attacker can cause errors to occur that the web application does not handle, they can gain detailed system information, deny service, cause security mechanisms to fail, or crash the server.
- A8 Insecure Storage
- Web applications frequently use cryptographic functions to protect information and credentials. These functions and the code to integrate them have proven difficult to code properly, frequently resulting in weak protection.
- A9 Application Denial of Service
- Attackers can consume web application resources to a point where other legitimate users can no longer access or use the application. Attackers can also lock users out of their accounts or even cause the entire application to fail.
- A10 Insecure Configuration Management
- Having a strong server configuration standard is critical to a secure web application. These servers have many configuration options that affect security and are not secure out of the box.
Acknowledgements
OWASP would like to thank the researchers at Aspect Security for their leadership and contributions to the Top Ten project.
The OWASP Top Ten project lead is Jeff Williams from Aspect Security. He can be contacted at jeff.williams 'at' owasp.org.
International Translators
- Ludovic Petit (French)
- Satoru Takahashi (Japanese)
- Jeremy Bae (Korean)
- Juan Carlos Calderon,
- Pedro DelReal, Rogelio Morell and Javier Muzquiz (Spanish)
Users and Adopters
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission strongly recommends that all companies use the OWASP Top Ten and ensure that their partners do the same. In addition, the U.S. Defense Information Systems Agency has listed the OWASP Top Ten as key best practices that should be used as part of the DOD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation (C&A) Process (DITSCAP).
In the commercial market, the Payment Card Industry (PCI) standard has adopted the OWASP Top Ten, and requires (among other things) that all merchants get a security code review for all their custom code. In addition, a broad range of companies and agencies around the globe are also using the OWASP Top Ten, including:
- Sprint
- IBM Global Services
- Cognizant
- Foundstone Strategic Security
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF)
- Sun Microsystems
- British Telecom
- National Australia Bank
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
- Sempra Energy
- Corillian Corporation
- A.G. Edwards
- Texas Dept of Human Services
- Predictive Systems
- Price Waterhouse Coopers
- Best Software
- Online Business Systems
- ZipForm
- Contra Costa County, CA
- SSP Solutions
- Recreational Equipment, Inc. (REI)
- Zapatec
- Cboss Internet
- Samsung SDS (Korea)
- Norfolk Southern
- Bank of Newport
- ...and many others
Several schools have also adopted the OWASP Top Ten as a part of their curriculum, including Michigan State University (MSU), and the University of California at San Diego (UCSD).
Feedback
Please let us know how your organization is using the Top Ten. Include your name, organization's name, and brief description of how you use the list. Thanks for supporting OWASP!
We hope you find the information in the OWASP Top Ten useful. Please contribute back to the project by sending your comments, questions, and suggestions to [email protected]. Thanks!
To join the OWASP Top Ten mailing list or view the archives, please visit the subscription page.
Project Sponsors
The OWASP Top Ten project is sponsored by
Subcategories
This category has the following 2 subcategories, out of 2 total.
O
Pages in category "OWASP Top Ten Project"
The following 107 pages are in this category, out of 107 total.
A
- A1 2004 Unvalidated Input
- A10 2004 Insecure Configuration Management
- A2 2004 Broken Access Control
- A3 2004 Broken Authentication and Session Management
- A4 2004 Cross Site Scripting
- A5 2004 Buffer Overflow
- A6 2004 Injection Flaws
- A7 2004 Improper Error Handling
- A8 2004 Insecure Storage
- A9 2004 Application Denial of Service
- Access Control In Your J2EE Application
C
G
T
- Top 10 2004
- Top 10 2007
- Top 10 2007-Broken Authentication and Session Management
- Top 10 2007-Cross Site Request Forgery
- Top 10 2007-Cross Site Scripting
- Top 10 2007-Failure to Restrict URL Access
- Top 10 2007-Information Leakage and Improper Error Handling
- Top 10 2007-Injection Flaws
- Top 10 2007-Insecure Communications
- Top 10 2007-Insecure Cryptographic Storage
- Top 10 2007-Insecure Direct Object Reference
- Top 10 2007-Malicious File Execution
- Top 10 2007-Methodology
- Top 10 2007-References
- Top 10 2007-Where to Go From Here
- Top 10 2010
- Top 10 2010-A1-Injection
- Top 10 2010-A10-Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
- Top 10 2010-A2-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
- Top 10 2010-A3-Broken Authentication and Session Management
- Top 10 2010-A4-Insecure Direct Object References
- Top 10 2010-A5-Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
- Top 10 2010-A6-Security Misconfiguration
- Top 10 2010-A7-Insecure Cryptographic Storage
- Top 10 2010-A8-Failure to Restrict URL Access
- Top 10 2010-A9-Insufficient Transport Layer Protection
- Top 10 2010-Main
- Top 10 2010-Notes About Risk
- Top 10 2010-Release Notes
- Top 10 2010-What's Next For Developers
- Top 10 2010-What's Next For Organizations
- Top 10 2010-What's Next For Verifiers
- Top 10 2013
- Top 10 2013-A1-Injection
- Top 10 2013-A10-Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
- Top 10 2013-A2-Broken Authentication and Session Management
- Top 10 2013-A3-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
- Top 10 2013-A4-Insecure Direct Object References
- Top 10 2013-A5-Security Misconfiguration
- Top 10 2013-A6-Sensitive Data Exposure
- Top 10 2013-A7-Missing Function Level Access Control
- Top 10 2013-A8-Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
- Top 10 2013-A9-Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities
- Top 10 2013-Details About Risk Factors
- Top 10 2013-Introduction
- Top 10 2013-Note About Risks
- Top 10 2013-Release Notes
- Top 10 2013-Risk
- Top 10 2013-Top 10
- Top 10 2013-What's Next for Developers
- Top 10 2013-What's Next for Organizations
- Top 10 2013-What's Next for Verifiers
- Template:Top 10 2013:BottomAdvancedTemplate
- Template:Top 10 2013:BottomTemplate
- Top 10-2017 A1-Injection
- Top 10-2017 A10-Insufficient Logging&Monitoring
- Top 10-2017 A2-Broken Authentication
- Top 10-2017 A3-Sensitive Data Exposure
- Top 10-2017 A4-XML External Entities (XXE)
- Top 10-2017 A5-Broken Access Control
- Top 10-2017 A6-Security Misconfiguration
- Top 10-2017 A7-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
- Top 10-2017 A8-Insecure Deserialization
- Top 10-2017 A9-Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities
- Top 10-2017 Acknowledgements
- Top 10-2017 Application Security Risks
- Top 10-2017 Details About Risk Factors
- Top 10-2017 Foreword
- Top 10-2017 Introduction
- Top 10-2017 Methodology and Data
- Top 10-2017 Note About Risks
- Top 10-2017 Release Notes
- Top 10-2017 Top 10
- Top 10-2017 What's Next for Application Managers
- Top 10-2017 What's Next for Developers
- Top 10-2017 What's Next for Organizations
- Top 10-2017 What's Next for Security Testers
Media in category "OWASP Top Ten Project"
The following 2 files are in this category, out of 2 total.