This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "EJB Bad Practices: Use of java.io"
m (→Description: Readability) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Template:Fortify}} | {{Template:Fortify}} | ||
| − | + | [[Category:FIXME|This is the text from the old template. This needs to be rewritten using the new template.]] | |
| + | |||
| + | Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[ASDR_TOC_Vulnerabilities|Vulnerabilities Table of Contents]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[ASDR Table of Contents]] | ||
| + | __TOC__ | ||
| − | |||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The program violates the Enterprise JavaBeans specification by using the java.io package. | ||
The Enterprise JavaBeans specification requires that every bean provider follow a set of programming guidelines designed to ensure that the bean will be portable and behave consistently in any EJB container [10]. | The Enterprise JavaBeans specification requires that every bean provider follow a set of programming guidelines designed to ensure that the bean will be portable and behave consistently in any EJB container [10]. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 27: | ||
resource manager API, such as JDBC, to store data." | resource manager API, such as JDBC, to store data." | ||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ==Risk Factors== |
| − | + | TBD | |
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ==Examples== |
| − | + | TBD | |
| − | [ | + | ==Related [[Attacks]]== |
| − | + | * [[Attack 1]] | |
| + | * [[Attack 2]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Related [[Vulnerabilities]]== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Vulnerability 1]] | ||
| + | * [[Vulnerabiltiy 2]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Related [[Controls]]== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Control 1]] | ||
| + | * [[Control 2]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Related [[Technical Impacts]]== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Technical Impact 1]] | ||
| + | * [[Technical Impact 2]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [1] Enterprise JavaBeans 2.1 Specification. Sun Microsystems. http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/docs.html. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:FIXME|add links | ||
| + | |||
| + | In addition, one should classify vulnerability based on the following subcategories: Ex:<nowiki>[[Category:Error Handling Vulnerability]]</nowiki> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Availability Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Authorization Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Authentication Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Concurrency Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Configuration Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cryptographic Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Encoding Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Error Handling Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Input Validation Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Logging and Auditing Vulnerability | ||
| + | |||
| + | Session Management Vulnerability]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | __NOTOC__ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:OWASP ASDR Project]] | ||
[[Category:Use of Dangerous API]] | [[Category:Use of Dangerous API]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Java]] | [[Category:Java]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Implementation]] | [[Category:Implementation]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:API Abuse]] | [[Category:API Abuse]] | ||
Revision as of 23:50, 23 September 2008
This is a Vulnerability. To view all vulnerabilities, please see the Vulnerability Category page.
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 09/23/2008
Vulnerabilities Table of Contents
Description
The program violates the Enterprise JavaBeans specification by using the java.io package.
The Enterprise JavaBeans specification requires that every bean provider follow a set of programming guidelines designed to ensure that the bean will be portable and behave consistently in any EJB container [10].
In this case, the program violates the following EJB guideline:
"An enterprise bean must not use the java.io package to attempt to access files and directories in the file system."
A requirement that the specification justifies in the following way:
"The file system APIs are not well-suited for business components to access data. Business components should use a resource manager API, such as JDBC, to store data."
Risk Factors
TBD
Examples
TBD
Related Attacks
Related Vulnerabilities
Related Controls
Related Technical Impacts
References
- [1] Enterprise JavaBeans 2.1 Specification. Sun Microsystems. http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/docs.html.