This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template SKAVENGER - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| + | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
The following "Ideas" have been accomblished: | The following "Ideas" have been accomblished: | ||
* A GUI to monitor and analyze scanning results | * A GUI to monitor and analyze scanning results | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
The gui component was realized more sophisticatedly then planed. | The gui component was realized more sophisticatedly then planed. | ||
| − | |||
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Skavenger|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | 2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Skavenger|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:white" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:white" align="left"| | ||
| − | |- | + | |- |
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
| + | More testing. Ideas for more compley (stateful) modules | ||
Assessment Criteria | Assessment Criteria | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| Line 51: | Line 52: | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| − | |- | + | |- |
| − | |||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
| + | * A GUI to monitor and analyze scanning results | ||
| + | * More sophisticated scanner modules (e.g. for better backend identification and more platform specific tests) | ||
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
Revision as of 18:50, 17 September 2008
Clik here to return to the previous page.
| FINAL REVIEW | ||
|---|---|---|
| PART I | ||
|
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
||
|
The following "Ideas" have been accomblished: * A GUI to monitor and analyze scanning results * More sophisticated scanner modules (e.g. for better backend identification and more platform specific tests) The gui component was realized more sophisticatedly then planed. 2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
||
|
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |
||
| PART II | ||
|
More testing. Ideas for more compley (stateful) modules Assessment Criteria |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
||
|
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
||
* A GUI to monitor and analyze scanning results * More sophisticated scanner modules (e.g. for better backend identification and more platform specific tests) 3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
||
|
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |
||
