This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "OWASP Security Integration System"
MB netblue4 (talk | contribs) (→OWASP Tool Project Template) |
MB netblue4 (talk | contribs) (→OWASP Tool Project Template) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
<b>Introduction</b><br> | <b>Introduction</b><br> | ||
− | Secure | + | Secure software development has a number of stakeholders. |
− | + | <ol> | |
+ | <li><b>IT risk</b>: I need to know where my highest risks are, so I can focus on mitigating these</li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Information security</b>: I need to generate a list f security requirements to protect against vulnerabilities</li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Compliance and Assurance</b>: I need to ensure the code meets security requirements and we have evidence proving that</li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Business</b>: I need to get the functionality to the market before our competitors </li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Development teams</b>: I need to do all of the above and within a two week sprint cycle :-)</li> | ||
+ | </ol> | ||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <b>What | + | <b>What impact do these stakeholder requirements have on software development</b><br> |
When the development team codes, for example, functionality that requires a front end screen and a database. | When the development team codes, for example, functionality that requires a front end screen and a database. | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
Line 38: | Line 45: | ||
<i>Development teams cannot perform these security tasks within a reasonable time frame, let alone a two week sprint cycle By this time the 2 week sprint cycle has elapsed and </i> | <i>Development teams cannot perform these security tasks within a reasonable time frame, let alone a two week sprint cycle By this time the 2 week sprint cycle has elapsed and </i> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 45: | Line 56: | ||
<b>Without control integration</b>: | <b>Without control integration</b>: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li>Dev teams read and understand the GDPR, ISO 27002, familiarise themselves with the organisation ISMS requirements and also, keep up to date with the technical changes in the development language they use. </li> | + | <li>Dev teams read and understand the GDPR, ISO 27002, familiarise themselves with the organisation ISMS requirements and also, keep up to date with the technical changes in the development language they use.</li> |
<li>This usually results in dev teams being referred to 50 page policy documents and told "Please implement this and we will check it after" </li> | <li>This usually results in dev teams being referred to 50 page policy documents and told "Please implement this and we will check it after" </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<b>With a planned control integration effort</b>: | <b>With a planned control integration effort</b>: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>Using a very simple, 5 screen, mySQL db tool based on OWASP data that</li> |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
<li>Generates security requirements before coding begins</li> | <li>Generates security requirements before coding begins</li> | ||
Line 66: | Line 68: | ||
<li>Speeding up the approval process to minimise its impact on responsiveness to market</li> | <li>Speeding up the approval process to minimise its impact on responsiveness to market</li> | ||
<li>Inform risk based decision making and prioritising</li> | <li>Inform risk based decision making and prioritising</li> | ||
+ | </ol> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <b>What does the Secure coding tool do?</b><br> | ||
+ | The secure coding tool, goes beyond theory and procedure and attempts to implement a planned control integration effort.<br> | ||
+ | The Secure coding tool is written in MVC \ MySQL and consists of 5 screens each serving a specific stakeholder | ||
+ | <ol> | ||
+ | <li><b>Information security stakeholder</b>: Filters the security requirements according to the functional requirement: Streamlining security requirements generation </li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Dev team stakeholder</b>: Provides secure code blocks to implement the security requirement: Providing code level guidance for developers towards correctly implementing security requirements</li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Dev team stakeholder</b>: Provides security test plans to testing the security requirements: Guiding testers towards correctly verifying security requirements are met</li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Compliance and assurance stakeholder</b>: Provides a central store for testing results: Promoting traceability through requirements and serving as a quick reference screen for assurance to view control assurance evidence, speeding up the approval process and minimising its impact on responsiveness to market</li> | ||
+ | <li><b>IT risk stakeholder</b>: Provides IT risk with an overview of each applications exposure to OWASP TOP 10 risks: Informing risk based decision making and prioritising</li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
Revision as of 11:19, 13 August 2019
Instructions are in RED text and should be removed from your document by deleting the text with the span tags. This document is intended to serve as an example of what is required of an OWASP project wiki page. The text in red serves as instructions, while the text in black serves as an example. Text in black is expected to be replaced entirely with information specific to your OWASP project. Project About
OWASP Tool Project TemplateThis section should include an overview of what the project is, why the project was started, and what security issue is being addressed by the project deliverable.
Introduction
Development teams cannot perform these security tasks within a reasonable time frame, let alone a two week sprint cycle By this time the 2 week sprint cycle has elapsed and
The solution(s)
With a planned control integration effort:
After reading this short article, please take a look at the video link below to see the tool in action. Summary of the tool functionality: Developers Testers Approvers \Assurance IT risk DescriptionThis is where you need to add your more robust project description. A project description should outline the purpose of the project, how it is used, and the value it provides to application security. Ideally, project descriptions should be written in such a way that there is no question what value the project provides to the software security community. This section will be seen and used in various places within the Projects Portal. Poorly written project descriptions therefore detract from a project’s visibility, so project leaders should ensure that the description is meaningful. The Tool Project Template is simply a sample project that was developed for instructional purposes that can be used to create default project pages for a Tool project. After copying this template to your new project, all you have to do is follow the instructions in red, replace the sample text with text suited for your project, and then delete the sections in red. Doing so should make it clearer to both consumers of this project, as well as OWASP reviewers who are trying to determine if the project can be promoted to the next category. The information requested is also intended to help Project Leaders think about the roadmap and feature priorities, and give guidance to the reviews as a result of that effort. Creating a new set of project pages from scratch can be a challenging task. By providing a sample layout, with instructional text and examples, the OWASP Tool Project Template makes it easier for Project Leaders to create effective security projects and hence helps promote security. Contextual custom dictionary builder with character substitution and word variations for pen-testers LicensingA project must be licensed under a community friendly or open source license. For more information on OWASP recommended licenses, please see OWASP Licenses. While OWASP does not promote any particular license over another, the vast majority of projects have chosen a Creative Commons license variant for documentation projects, or a GNU General Public License variant for tools and code projects. This example assumes that you want to use the AGPL 3.0 license. This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the link GNU Affero General Public License 3.0 as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. OWASP XXX and any contributions are Copyright © by {the Project Leader(s) or OWASP} {Year(s)}. RoadmapAs of November, 2013, the highest priorities for the next 6 months are:
Subsequent Releases will add
Getting InvolvedInvolvement in the development and promotion of Tool Project Template is actively encouraged! You do not have to be a security expert or a programmer to contribute. Some of the ways you can help are as follows: |
Project ResourcesThis is where you can link to the key locations for project files, including setup programs, the source code repository, online documentation, a Wiki Home Page, threaded discussions about the project, and Issue Tracking system, etc. Project LeaderA project leader is the individual who decides to lead the project throughout its lifecycle. The project leader is responsible for communicating the project’s progress to the OWASP Foundation, and he/she is ultimately responsible for the project’s deliverables. The project leader must provide OWASP with his/her real name and contact e-mail address for his/her project application to be accepted, as OWASP prides itself on the openness of its products, operations, and members. Related ProjectsThis is where you can link to other OWASP Projects that are similar to yours. Classifications |