This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Choosing and Using Security Questions Cheat Sheet"
From OWASP
(Created page with "The "Choosing and Using" part of the title read quite awkwardly the first couple times i saw this link. Consider renaming this cheat sheet to just "Security Questions Cheat Sh...") |
Douglasheld (talk | contribs) (→Security questions: dubious value: new section) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The "Choosing and Using" part of the title read quite awkwardly the first couple times i saw this link. Consider renaming this cheat sheet to just "Security Questions Cheat Sheet". [[User:Gabe Friedmann|Gabe Friedmann]] 17:24, 15 October 2012 (UTC) | The "Choosing and Using" part of the title read quite awkwardly the first couple times i saw this link. Consider renaming this cheat sheet to just "Security Questions Cheat Sheet". [[User:Gabe Friedmann|Gabe Friedmann]] 17:24, 15 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Security questions: dubious value == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Security Questions should go the way of the dodo. What is the point of subverting a strong password with more easily guessed security questions? If SQ were stronger, they would form a better primary login factor. But, they are not. |
Revision as of 13:47, 8 July 2018
The "Choosing and Using" part of the title read quite awkwardly the first couple times i saw this link. Consider renaming this cheat sheet to just "Security Questions Cheat Sheet". Gabe Friedmann 17:24, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Security questions: dubious value
Security Questions should go the way of the dodo. What is the point of subverting a strong password with more easily guessed security questions? If SQ were stronger, they would form a better primary login factor. But, they are not.