This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Proposal OWASP SummerofCode 2015"
(Created page with "==Summer of Code 2015 Proposal== This page outlines a proposal for implementing a Summer of Code @ OWASP for 2015 This program will run the similar way than Google Summer of C...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This page outlines a proposal for implementing a Summer of Code @ OWASP for 2015 | This page outlines a proposal for implementing a Summer of Code @ OWASP for 2015 | ||
This program will run the similar way than Google Summer of Code | This program will run the similar way than Google Summer of Code | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Rules for participation== | ||
| + | *Only active Projects are allowed to participate | ||
| + | * Project with inactivity longer than 2 years are not taken in consideration | ||
| + | |||
==Proposed Timeline== | ==Proposed Timeline== | ||
| − | 1st May ==> Program is officially | + | 1st May ==> Program is officially announced |
| − | 2nd May ==>Mentoring projects can start filling in the Wiki page with their participating | + | 2nd May ==>Mentoring projects can start filling in the Wiki page with their participating proposals, and look for students to create proposals |
| − | 30 | + | 15 June - 30 June- Interim Period : Project leaders will decide which students are finally selected for their own projects |
| − | + | 1st july-15 July ==> Organisation Admins will review submitted final proposals chosen by Project mentors for each project | |
| + | 26 July ==> Slots will be allocated to the best proposals after a rigorous voting review | ||
| + | 27 July ==> Program starts - code! | ||
| + | 15 September ==> Midterm evaluation | ||
| + | 27 October==>Pencils down, final evaluation | ||
| + | Vote weight will be distributed as following: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Process== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *OWASP Open source projects who'd like to participate in OWASP Summer of Code in 2015 should choose at least two project leaders to represent them. | ||
| + | *Students submit project proposals online to work with particular mentoring projects. | ||
| + | *Mentoring Project leaders rank student proposals and perform any other due diligence on their potential students; student proposals are matched with a mentor. | ||
| + | *Mentoring project leaders make their final decision on which students to accept into the program. | ||
| + | *Students are notified of acceptance. | ||
| + | *Students begin learning more about their mentoring organization and its community before coding work starts. | ||
| + | *Students begin coding work at the official start of the program, provided they've interacted well with their community up until the program start date. | ||
| + | *Mentors and students provide mid-term progress evaluations. | ||
| + | *Mentors provide a final evaluation of student progress at close of program; students submit a final review of their mentor and the program. | ||
| + | *Students upload completed code to an open repository/ Code site. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Voting Rules=== | ||
| + | *Organization Admins deciding on which projects will get slots cannot be mentors of the participating project | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Project mentors will decide the best proposal and request a maximum slots based on their maturity stage: | ||
| + | Flagship==> maximum 2 Slots | ||
| + | Labs==> Maximum 1 Slot | ||
| + | Incubator==> Maximum 1 Slot | ||
| + | |||
| + | *each vote must be substantiated by an argument why the project was voted | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Students that are already contributors will get 2 points extra | ||
| + | |||
| + | A student proposal will receive a score distributed the following way | ||
| + | Score range : 0 -100 | ||
| + | *Vote mentors==> 55% | ||
| + | *Vote Organization admins==> 45% | ||
| + | |||
==Budget== | ==Budget== | ||
| − | The requested budget is | + | The requested budget is USD 30,000- (10 Slots , 1 student==> USD 3000) |
| + | A total of 10 Slots will be allocated | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Breakdown budget=== | ||
| − | = | + | A selected student will receive USD 3,000= for 3 months work, a midterm evaluation and control will be exercised to determined of the candidate has delivered according the planning |
| − | + | ==Student Elegability== | |
| + | Students can submit their proposals via the XXXXX from 15May - 15 June, 2015. We hear almost universally from our mentoring organizations that the best proposals they receive are from students who took the time to interact and discuss their ideas before submitting a proposal, so make sure to check out each organization's Ideas list to get to know a particular open source organization better. In addition to a proposal, students will be required to sign a Student Participation Agreement and submit their Proof of Enrollment forms. | ||
Revision as of 01:24, 8 April 2015
Summer of Code 2015 Proposal
This page outlines a proposal for implementing a Summer of Code @ OWASP for 2015 This program will run the similar way than Google Summer of Code
Rules for participation
- Only active Projects are allowed to participate
- Project with inactivity longer than 2 years are not taken in consideration
Proposed Timeline
1st May ==> Program is officially announced 2nd May ==>Mentoring projects can start filling in the Wiki page with their participating proposals, and look for students to create proposals 15 June - 30 June- Interim Period : Project leaders will decide which students are finally selected for their own projects 1st july-15 July ==> Organisation Admins will review submitted final proposals chosen by Project mentors for each project 26 July ==> Slots will be allocated to the best proposals after a rigorous voting review 27 July ==> Program starts - code! 15 September ==> Midterm evaluation 27 October==>Pencils down, final evaluation Vote weight will be distributed as following:
Process
- OWASP Open source projects who'd like to participate in OWASP Summer of Code in 2015 should choose at least two project leaders to represent them.
- Students submit project proposals online to work with particular mentoring projects.
- Mentoring Project leaders rank student proposals and perform any other due diligence on their potential students; student proposals are matched with a mentor.
- Mentoring project leaders make their final decision on which students to accept into the program.
- Students are notified of acceptance.
- Students begin learning more about their mentoring organization and its community before coding work starts.
- Students begin coding work at the official start of the program, provided they've interacted well with their community up until the program start date.
- Mentors and students provide mid-term progress evaluations.
- Mentors provide a final evaluation of student progress at close of program; students submit a final review of their mentor and the program.
- Students upload completed code to an open repository/ Code site.
Voting Rules
- Organization Admins deciding on which projects will get slots cannot be mentors of the participating project
- Project mentors will decide the best proposal and request a maximum slots based on their maturity stage:
Flagship==> maximum 2 Slots Labs==> Maximum 1 Slot Incubator==> Maximum 1 Slot
- each vote must be substantiated by an argument why the project was voted
- Students that are already contributors will get 2 points extra
A student proposal will receive a score distributed the following way Score range : 0 -100
- Vote mentors==> 55%
- Vote Organization admins==> 45%
Budget
The requested budget is USD 30,000- (10 Slots , 1 student==> USD 3000) A total of 10 Slots will be allocated
Breakdown budget
A selected student will receive USD 3,000= for 3 months work, a midterm evaluation and control will be exercised to determined of the candidate has delivered according the planning
Student Elegability
Students can submit their proposals via the XXXXX from 15May - 15 June, 2015. We hear almost universally from our mentoring organizations that the best proposals they receive are from students who took the time to interact and discuss their ideas before submitting a proposal, so make sure to check out each organization's Ideas list to get to know a particular open source organization better. In addition to a proposal, students will be required to sign a Student Participation Agreement and submit their Proof of Enrollment forms.