This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Testing for MS Access"
(Final edit) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Short Description of the Issue == | == Short Description of the Issue == | ||
− | As explained in the generic [[SQL injection]] section, SQL injection vulnerabilities occur whenever user-supplied input is used during the construction of a SQL query without being adequately constrained or sanitized. This class of vulnerabilities allows an attacker to execute SQL code under the privileges of the user that is used to connect to the database. | + | As explained in the generic [[SQL injection]] section, SQL injection vulnerabilities occur whenever user-supplied input is used during the construction of a SQL query without being adequately constrained or sanitized. This class of vulnerabilities allows an attacker to execute SQL code under the privileges of the user that is used to connect to the database. In this section, relevant SQL injection techniques that utilize specific features of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Access Microsoft Access] will be discussed. |
− | |||
== Black Box Testing and Example == | == Black Box Testing and Example == | ||
Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
=== Fingerprinting === | === Fingerprinting === | ||
− | Fingerprinting the specific database technology while testing SQL-powered application is the first step to properly asses potential vulnerabilities. | + | Fingerprinting the specific database technology while testing SQL-powered application is the first step to properly asses potential vulnerabilities. A common approach involves injecting standard SQL injection attack patterns (e.g. single quote, double quote, ...) in order to trigger database exceptions. Assuming that the application does not handle exceptions with custom pages, it is possible to fingerprint the underline DBMS by observing error messages. |
− | A common approach involves injecting standard SQL injection attack patterns (e.g. single quote, double quote, ...) in order to trigger database exceptions. | + | |
− | + | ||
− | Assuming that the application does not handle exceptions with custom pages, it is possible to fingerprint the underline DBMS by observing error messages. | ||
Depending on the specific web technology used, MS Access driven applications will respond with one of the following errors: | Depending on the specific web technology used, MS Access driven applications will respond with one of the following errors: | ||
Line 25: | Line 23: | ||
Microsoft Office Access Database Engine | Microsoft Office Access Database Engine | ||
+ | |||
In all cases, we have a confirmation that we're testing an application using MS Access database. | In all cases, we have a confirmation that we're testing an application using MS Access database. | ||
+ | |||
=== Basic Testing === | === Basic Testing === | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
* and many others | * and many others | ||
− | |||
− | As mentioned, it is not possible to use the trick of inserting the characters <code>/*</code>, <code>--</code> or <code>#</code> in order to truncate the query. However, we can fortunately bypass this limitation by injecting a 'null' character. Using a null byte <code>%00</code> within | + | Nevertheless, it is possible to emulate those functions by combining multiple operators or by using alternative techniques. As mentioned, it is not possible to use the trick of inserting the characters <code>/*</code>, <code>--</code> or <code>#</code> in order to truncate the query. However, we can fortunately bypass this limitation by injecting a 'null' character. Using a null byte <code>%00</code> within a SQL query results in MS Access ignoring all remaining characters. This can be explained by considering that all strings are NULL terminated in the internal representation used by the database. It is worth mentioning that the 'null' character can sometimes cause troubles too as it may truncate strings at the web server level. In those situations, we can however employ another character: 0x16 (%16 in URL encoded format). |
− | a SQL query results in MS Access ignoring all remaining characters. This can be explained by considering that all strings are NULL terminated in the internal representation used by the database. It is worth mentioning that the 'null' character can sometimes cause troubles too as it may truncate strings at the web server level. In those situations, we can however employ another character: 0x16 (%16 in URL encoded format). | + | |
Considering the following query: | Considering the following query: | ||
Line 56: | Line 55: | ||
http://www.example.com/page.app?id=2'+UNION+SELECT+TOP+3+name+FROM+appsTable%00 | http://www.example.com/page.app?id=2'+UNION+SELECT+TOP+3+name+FROM+appsTable%00 | ||
− | By combining both operators, it is possible to select specific results. | + | By combining both operators, it is possible to select specific results. String concatenation is possible by using <code>& (%26)</code> and <code>+ (%2b)</code> characters. |
− | |||
There are also many other functions that can be used while testing SQL injection, including but not limited to: | There are also many other functions that can be used while testing SQL injection, including but not limited to: | ||
Line 68: | Line 66: | ||
* TOP: This function allows you to specify the maximum number of results that the query should return from the top. For example TOP 1 will return only 1 row. | * TOP: This function allows you to specify the maximum number of results that the query should return from the top. For example TOP 1 will return only 1 row. | ||
* LAST: This function is used to select only the last row of a set of rows. For example the following query SELECT last(*) FROM users will return only the last row of the result. | * LAST: This function is used to select only the last row of a set of rows. For example the following query SELECT last(*) FROM users will return only the last row of the result. | ||
+ | |||
Some of these operators are essential to exploit blind SQL injections. For other advanced operators, please refer to the documents in the references. | Some of these operators are essential to exploit blind SQL injections. For other advanced operators, please refer to the documents in the references. | ||
+ | |||
==== Attributes Enumeration ==== | ==== Attributes Enumeration ==== | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
' GROUP BY Id%00 | ' GROUP BY Id%00 | ||
+ | |||
In the error message received, it is possible to observe the name of the next column. At this point, we can iterate the | In the error message received, it is possible to observe the name of the next column. At this point, we can iterate the | ||
method until we obtain the name of all attributes. If we don't know the name of the first attribute, we can still insert a fictitious column name and obtain the name of the first attribute within the error message. | method until we obtain the name of all attributes. If we don't know the name of the first attribute, we can still insert a fictitious column name and obtain the name of the first attribute within the error message. | ||
+ | |||
==== Obtaining Database Schema ==== | ==== Obtaining Database Schema ==== | ||
Line 89: | Line 91: | ||
* MSysACEs | * MSysACEs | ||
* MSysAccessXML | * MSysAccessXML | ||
+ | |||
For example, if a union SQL injection vulnerability exists, you can use the following query: | For example, if a union SQL injection vulnerability exists, you can use the following query: | ||
' UNION SELECT Name FROM MSysObjects WHERE Type = 1%00 | ' UNION SELECT Name FROM MSysObjects WHERE Type = 1%00 | ||
+ | |||
Alternatively, it is always possible to bruteforce the database schema by using a standard wordlist (e.g. [http://code.google.com/p/fuzzdb/ FuzzDb]). | Alternatively, it is always possible to bruteforce the database schema by using a standard wordlist (e.g. [http://code.google.com/p/fuzzdb/ FuzzDb]). | ||
+ | |||
In some cases, developers or system administrators do not realize that including the actual ''.mdb'' file within the application webroot can allow to download the entire database. Database filenames can be inferred with the following query: | In some cases, developers or system administrators do not realize that including the actual ''.mdb'' file within the application webroot can allow to download the entire database. Database filenames can be inferred with the following query: | ||
http://www.example.com/page.app?id=1'+UNION+SELECT+1+FROM+name.table%00 | http://www.example.com/page.app?id=1'+UNION+SELECT+1+FROM+name.table%00 | ||
+ | |||
where <code>name</code> is the ''.mdb'' filename and <code>table</code> is a valid database table. | where <code>name</code> is the ''.mdb'' filename and <code>table</code> is a valid database table. | ||
In case of password protected databases, multiple software utilities can be used to crack the password. Please refer to the references. | In case of password protected databases, multiple software utilities can be used to crack the password. Please refer to the references. | ||
+ | |||
=== Blind SQL Injection Testing === | === Blind SQL Injection Testing === | ||
[[Blind SQL Injection]] vulnerabilities are by no means the most easily exploitable SQL injections while testing real-life applications. In case of recent versions of MS Access, it is also not feasible to execute shell commands or read/write arbitrary files. | [[Blind SQL Injection]] vulnerabilities are by no means the most easily exploitable SQL injections while testing real-life applications. In case of recent versions of MS Access, it is also not feasible to execute shell commands or read/write arbitrary files. | ||
+ | |||
In case of blind SQL injections, the attacker can only infer the result of the query by evaluating time differences or application responses. It is supposed that the reader already knows the theory behind blind SQL injection attacks, as the remaining part of this section will focus on MS Access specific details. | In case of blind SQL injections, the attacker can only infer the result of the query by evaluating time differences or application responses. It is supposed that the reader already knows the theory behind blind SQL injection attacks, as the remaining part of this section will focus on MS Access specific details. | ||
+ | |||
The following example is used: | The following example is used: | ||
Line 116: | Line 125: | ||
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE [id]=$myId | SELECT * FROM orders WHERE [id]=$myId | ||
+ | |||
Let's consider the <code>myId</code> parameter vulnerable to blind SQL injection. As an attacker, we want to extract the content of column 'username' in the table 'users', assuming that we have already disclosed the database schema. | Let's consider the <code>myId</code> parameter vulnerable to blind SQL injection. As an attacker, we want to extract the content of column 'username' in the table 'users', assuming that we have already disclosed the database schema. | ||
+ | |||
A typical query that can be used to infer the first character of the username of the 10th rows is: | A typical query that can be used to infer the first character of the username of the 10th rows is: | ||
Line 124: | Line 135: | ||
If the first character is 'a', the query will return 0 or otherwise the string 'no'. | If the first character is 'a', the query will return 0 or otherwise the string 'no'. | ||
+ | |||
By using a combination of the IFF, MID, LAST and TOP functions, it is possible to extract the first character of the username on a specifically selected row. As the inner query returns a set of records, and not just one, it is not possible to use it directly. Fortunately, we can combine multiple functions to extract a specific string. | By using a combination of the IFF, MID, LAST and TOP functions, it is possible to extract the first character of the username on a specifically selected row. As the inner query returns a set of records, and not just one, it is not possible to use it directly. Fortunately, we can combine multiple functions to extract a specific string. | ||
+ | |||
Let's assume that we want to retrieve the username of the 10th row. First, we can use the TOP function to select the first ten rows using the following query: | Let's assume that we want to retrieve the username of the 10th row. First, we can use the TOP function to select the first ten rows using the following query: | ||
SELECT TOP 10 username FROM users | SELECT TOP 10 username FROM users | ||
+ | |||
Then, using this subset, we can extract the last row by using the LAST function. Once we have only one row and exactly the row containing our string, we can use the IFF, MID and LAST functions to infer the actual value of the username. In our example, we employ IFF to return a number or a string. Using this trick, we can distinguish whether we have a true response or not, by observing application error responses. As <code>id</code> is numeric, the comparison with a string results in a SQL error that can be potentially leaked by <code>500 Internal Server Error pages</code>. Otherwise, a standard <code>200 OK</code> page will be likely returned. | Then, using this subset, we can extract the last row by using the LAST function. Once we have only one row and exactly the row containing our string, we can use the IFF, MID and LAST functions to infer the actual value of the username. In our example, we employ IFF to return a number or a string. Using this trick, we can distinguish whether we have a true response or not, by observing application error responses. As <code>id</code> is numeric, the comparison with a string results in a SQL error that can be potentially leaked by <code>500 Internal Server Error pages</code>. Otherwise, a standard <code>200 OK</code> page will be likely returned. | ||
+ | |||
For example, we can have the following query: | For example, we can have the following query: | ||
Line 138: | Line 153: | ||
that is TRUE if the first character is 'a' or false otherwise. | that is TRUE if the first character is 'a' or false otherwise. | ||
+ | |||
As mentioned, this method allows to infer the value of arbitrary strings within the database: | As mentioned, this method allows to infer the value of arbitrary strings within the database: | ||
Line 143: | Line 159: | ||
# By trying all printable values, until we find a match | # By trying all printable values, until we find a match | ||
# By inferring the length of the string using the LEN function, or by simply stopping after we have found all characters | # By inferring the length of the string using the LEN function, or by simply stopping after we have found all characters | ||
+ | |||
Time-based blind SQL injections are also possible by abusing [http://technet.microsoft.com/it-it/library/cc512676%28en-us%29.aspx heavy queries]. | Time-based blind SQL injections are also possible by abusing [http://technet.microsoft.com/it-it/library/cc512676%28en-us%29.aspx heavy queries]. | ||
+ | |||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 09:38, 19 May 2014
This article is part of the new OWASP Testing Guide v4.
Back to the OWASP Testing Guide v4 ToC: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Guide_v4_Table_of_Contents Back to the OWASP Testing Guide Project: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Project
Short Description of the Issue
As explained in the generic SQL injection section, SQL injection vulnerabilities occur whenever user-supplied input is used during the construction of a SQL query without being adequately constrained or sanitized. This class of vulnerabilities allows an attacker to execute SQL code under the privileges of the user that is used to connect to the database. In this section, relevant SQL injection techniques that utilize specific features of Microsoft Access will be discussed.
Black Box Testing and Example
Fingerprinting
Fingerprinting the specific database technology while testing SQL-powered application is the first step to properly asses potential vulnerabilities. A common approach involves injecting standard SQL injection attack patterns (e.g. single quote, double quote, ...) in order to trigger database exceptions. Assuming that the application does not handle exceptions with custom pages, it is possible to fingerprint the underline DBMS by observing error messages.
Depending on the specific web technology used, MS Access driven applications will respond with one of the following errors:
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'com_exception' with message Source: Microsoft JET Database Engine
or
Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80040e14'
or
Microsoft Office Access Database Engine
In all cases, we have a confirmation that we're testing an application using MS Access database.
Basic Testing
Unfortunately, MS Access doesn't support typical operators that are traditionally used during SQL injection testing, including:
- No comments characters
- No stacked queries
- No LIMIT operator
- No SLEEP or BENCHMARK alike operators
- and many others
Nevertheless, it is possible to emulate those functions by combining multiple operators or by using alternative techniques. As mentioned, it is not possible to use the trick of inserting the characters /*
, --
or #
in order to truncate the query. However, we can fortunately bypass this limitation by injecting a 'null' character. Using a null byte %00
within a SQL query results in MS Access ignoring all remaining characters. This can be explained by considering that all strings are NULL terminated in the internal representation used by the database. It is worth mentioning that the 'null' character can sometimes cause troubles too as it may truncate strings at the web server level. In those situations, we can however employ another character: 0x16 (%16 in URL encoded format).
Considering the following query:
SELECT [username],[password] FROM users WHERE [username]='$myUsername' AND [password]='$myPassword'
We can truncate the query with the following two URLs:
http://www.example.com/page.asp?user=admin'%00&pass=foo http://www.example.com/page.app?user=admin'%16&pass=foo
The LIMIT
operator is not implemented in MS Access, however it is possible to limit the number of results by using the TOP
or LAST
operators instead.
http://www.example.com/page.app?id=2'+UNION+SELECT+TOP+3+name+FROM+appsTable%00
By combining both operators, it is possible to select specific results. String concatenation is possible by using & (%26)
and + (%2b)
characters.
There are also many other functions that can be used while testing SQL injection, including but not limited to:
- ASC: Obtain the ASCII value of a character passed as input
- CHR: Obtain the character of the ASCII value passed as input
- LEN: Return the length of the string passed as parameter
- IIF: Is the IF construct, for example the following statement IIF(1=1, 'a', 'b') return 'a'
- MID: This function allows you to extract substring, for example the following statement mid('abc',1,1) return 'a'
- TOP: This function allows you to specify the maximum number of results that the query should return from the top. For example TOP 1 will return only 1 row.
- LAST: This function is used to select only the last row of a set of rows. For example the following query SELECT last(*) FROM users will return only the last row of the result.
Some of these operators are essential to exploit blind SQL injections. For other advanced operators, please refer to the documents in the references.
Attributes Enumeration
In order to enumerate the column of a database table, it is possible to use a common error-based technique. In short, we can obtain the attributes name by analyzing error messages and repeating the query with different selectors. For example, assuming that we know the existence of a column, we can also obtain the name of the remaining attributes with the following query:
' GROUP BY Id%00
In the error message received, it is possible to observe the name of the next column. At this point, we can iterate the
method until we obtain the name of all attributes. If we don't know the name of the first attribute, we can still insert a fictitious column name and obtain the name of the first attribute within the error message.
Obtaining Database Schema
Various system tables exist by default in MS Access that can be potentially used to obtain table names and columns. Unfortunately, in the default configuration of recent MS Access database releases, these tables are not accessible. Nevertheless, it is always worth trying:
- MSysObjects
- MSysACEs
- MSysAccessXML
For example, if a union SQL injection vulnerability exists, you can use the following query:
' UNION SELECT Name FROM MSysObjects WHERE Type = 1%00
Alternatively, it is always possible to bruteforce the database schema by using a standard wordlist (e.g. FuzzDb).
In some cases, developers or system administrators do not realize that including the actual .mdb file within the application webroot can allow to download the entire database. Database filenames can be inferred with the following query:
http://www.example.com/page.app?id=1'+UNION+SELECT+1+FROM+name.table%00
where name
is the .mdb filename and table
is a valid database table.
In case of password protected databases, multiple software utilities can be used to crack the password. Please refer to the references.
Blind SQL Injection Testing
Blind SQL Injection vulnerabilities are by no means the most easily exploitable SQL injections while testing real-life applications. In case of recent versions of MS Access, it is also not feasible to execute shell commands or read/write arbitrary files.
In case of blind SQL injections, the attacker can only infer the result of the query by evaluating time differences or application responses. It is supposed that the reader already knows the theory behind blind SQL injection attacks, as the remaining part of this section will focus on MS Access specific details.
The following example is used:
http://www.example.com/index.php?myId=[sql]
where the id parameter is used within the following query:
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE [id]=$myId
Let's consider the myId
parameter vulnerable to blind SQL injection. As an attacker, we want to extract the content of column 'username' in the table 'users', assuming that we have already disclosed the database schema.
A typical query that can be used to infer the first character of the username of the 10th rows is:
http://www.example.com/index.php?id=IIF((select%20MID(LAST(username),1,1)%20from%20(select%20TOP%2010%20username%20from%20users))='a',0,'no')
If the first character is 'a', the query will return 0 or otherwise the string 'no'.
By using a combination of the IFF, MID, LAST and TOP functions, it is possible to extract the first character of the username on a specifically selected row. As the inner query returns a set of records, and not just one, it is not possible to use it directly. Fortunately, we can combine multiple functions to extract a specific string.
Let's assume that we want to retrieve the username of the 10th row. First, we can use the TOP function to select the first ten rows using the following query:
SELECT TOP 10 username FROM users
Then, using this subset, we can extract the last row by using the LAST function. Once we have only one row and exactly the row containing our string, we can use the IFF, MID and LAST functions to infer the actual value of the username. In our example, we employ IFF to return a number or a string. Using this trick, we can distinguish whether we have a true response or not, by observing application error responses. As id
is numeric, the comparison with a string results in a SQL error that can be potentially leaked by 500 Internal Server Error pages
. Otherwise, a standard 200 OK
page will be likely returned.
For example, we can have the following query:
http://www.example.com/index.php?id='%20AND%201=0%20OR%20'a'=IIF((select%20MID(LAST(username),1,1)%20from%20(select%20TOP%2010%20username%20from%20users))='a','a','b')%00
that is TRUE if the first character is 'a' or false otherwise.
As mentioned, this method allows to infer the value of arbitrary strings within the database:
- By trying all printable values, until we find a match
- By inferring the length of the string using the LEN function, or by simply stopping after we have found all characters
Time-based blind SQL injections are also possible by abusing heavy queries.