This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Testing for Web Application Fingerprint (OWASP-IG-004)"
(→Malformed requests test) |
(→Black Box testing and example) |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
Accept-ranges: bytes | Accept-ranges: bytes | ||
Connection: close | Connection: close | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | From a '''SunONE 6.1''' server: | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | HTTP/1.1 200 OK | ||
+ | Server: Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1 | ||
+ | Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:53:45 GMT | ||
+ | Content-length: 1186 | ||
+ | Content-type: text/html | ||
+ | Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:50:31 GMT | ||
+ | Last-Modified: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:58:26 GMT | ||
+ | Accept-Ranges: bytes | ||
+ | Connection: close | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
However, this testing methodology is not so good. There are several techniques that allow a web site to obfuscate or to modify the server banner string. | However, this testing methodology is not so good. There are several techniques that allow a web site to obfuscate or to modify the server banner string. |
Revision as of 21:00, 29 January 2007
[Up]
OWASP Testing Guide v2 Table of Contents
Brief Summary
Web server fingerprinting is a critical task for the penetration tester. Knowing the version and type of a running web server allows testers to determine known vulnerabilities and the appropriate exploits to use during testing.
Description of the Issue
There are several different vendors and versions of web servers on the market today. Knowing the type of web server that you are testing significantly helps in the testing process, and will also change the course of the test. This information can be derived by sending the web server specific commands and analyzing the output, as each version of web server software may respond differently to these commands. By knowing how each type of web server responds to specific commands and keeping this information in a web server fingerprint database, a penetration tester can send these commands to the web server, analyze the respsonse, and compare it to the database of known signatures. Please note that it usually takes several different commands to accurately identify the web server, as different versions may react similarly to the same command. Rarely, however, do different versions react the same to all HTTP commands. So, by sending several different commands, you increase the accuracy of your guess.
Black Box testing and example
The simplest and most basic form of identifying a web server is to look at the Server field in the HTTP response header. For our experiments we use netcat. Consider the following HTTP Request-Response:
$ nc 202.41.76.251 80 HEAD / HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 02:53:29 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.3 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux) Last-Modified: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 11:18:14 GMT ETag: "1813-49b-361b4df6" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 1179 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html $
from the Server field we understand that the server is Apache, version 1.3.3, running on Linux operating system. Three examples of the HTTP response headers are shown below:
From an Apache 1.3.23 server:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:10: 49 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.23 Last-Modified: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:48: 19 GMT ETag: 32417-c4-3e5d8a83 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 196 Connection: close Content-Type: text/HTML
From a Microsoft IIS 5.0 server:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 Expires: Yours, 17 Jun 2003 01:41: 33 GMT Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 01:41: 33 GMT Content-Type: text/HTML Accept-Ranges: bytes Last-Modified: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:32: 21 GMT ETag: b0aac0542e25c31: 89d Content-Length: 7369
From a Netscape Enterprise 4.1 server:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Netscape-Enterprise/4.1 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:19: 04 GMT Content-type: text/HTML Last-modified: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:37: 56 GMT Content-length: 57 Accept-ranges: bytes Connection: close
From a SunONE 6.1 server:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:53:45 GMT Content-length: 1186 Content-type: text/html Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:50:31 GMT Last-Modified: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:58:26 GMT Accept-Ranges: bytes Connection: close
However, this testing methodology is not so good. There are several techniques that allow a web site to obfuscate or to modify the server banner string. For example we could obtain the following answer:
403 HTTP/1.1 Forbidden Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 02:41: 27 GMT Server: Unknown-Webserver/1.0 Connection: close Content-Type: text/HTML; charset=iso-8859-1
In this case the server field of that response is obfuscated: we cannot know what type of web server is running.
Protocol behaviour
Refined techniques of testing take into consideration various characteristics of the several web servers available on the market. We will list some methodologies that allow us to deduce the type of web server in use.
HTTP header field ordering
The first method consists of observing the ordering of the several headers in the response. Every web server has an inner ordering of the header. We consider the following answers as an example:
Response from Apache 1.3.23
$ nc apache.example.com 80 HEAD / HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:10: 49 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.23 Last-Modified: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:48: 19 GMT ETag: 32417-c4-3e5d8a83 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 196 Connection: close Content-Type: text/HTML
Response from IIS 5.0
$ nc iis.example.com 80 HEAD / HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 Content-Location: http://iis.example.com/Default.htm Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 20:13: 52 GMT Content-Type: text/HTML Accept-Ranges: bytes Last-Modified: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 20:13: 52 GMT ETag: W/e0d362a4c335be1: ae1 Content-Length: 133
Response from Netscape Enterprise 4.1
$ nc netscape.example.com 80 HEAD / HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Netscape-Enterprise/4.1 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:01: 40 GMT Content-type: text/HTML Last-modified: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:37: 56 GMT Content-length: 57 Accept-ranges: bytes Connection: close
We can notice that the ordering of the Date field and the Server field differs between Apache, Netscape Enterprise and IIS.
Malformed requests test
Another useful test to execute involves sending malformed requests or requests of nonexistent pages to the server. We consider the following HTTP response:
Response from Apache 1.3.23
$ nc apache.example.com 80 GET / HTTP/3.0 HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:12: 37 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.23 Connection: close Transfer: chunked Content-Type: text/HTML; charset=iso-8859-1
Response from IIS 5.0
$ nc iis.example.com 80 GET / HTTP/3.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 Content-Location: http://iis.example.com/Default.htm Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 20:14: 02 GMT Content-Type: text/HTML Accept-Ranges: bytes Last-Modified: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 20:14: 02 GMT ETag: W/e0d362a4c335be1: ae1 Content-Length: 133
Response from Netscape Enterprise 4.1
$ nc netscape.example.com 80 GET / HTTP/3.0 HTTP/1.1 505 HTTP Version Not Supported Server: Netscape-Enterprise/4.1 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:04: 04 GMT Content-length: 140 Content-type: text/HTML Connection: close
We notice that every server answers in a different way. The answer also differs in the version of the server. An analogous issue comes if we create requests with a non-existant protocol. Consider the following responses:
Response from Apache 1.3.23
$ nc apache.example.com 80 GET / JUNK/1.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:17: 47 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.23 Last-Modified: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:48: 19 GMT ETag: 32417-c4-3e5d8a83 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 196 Connection: close Content-Type: text/HTML
Response from IIS 5.0
$ nc iis.example.com 80 GET / JUNK/1.0 HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 20:14: 34 GMT Content-Type: text/HTML Content-Length: 87
Response from Netscape Enterprise 4.1
$ nc netscape.example.com 80 GET / JUNK/1.0 <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Bad request</TITLE></HEAD> <BODY><H1>Bad request</H1> Your browser sent to query this server could not understand. </BODY></HTML>
Automated Testing
As can be appreciated from above, a number of tests are needed in order to accurately determine the type and version of web server in use. There are tools available which can automate these tests. One such example is "httprint" which compares the web server response with a signature dictionary and then makes a judgement with associated confidence rating.
An example of such tool is shown below:
Bad request
Your browser sent to query this server could not understand.</BODY></HTML>
Automated Testing
As can be appreciated from above, a number of tests are needed in order to accurately determine the type and version of web server in use. There are tools available which can automate these tests. One such example is "httprint" which compares the web server response with a signature dictionary and then makes a judgement with associated confidence rating.
An example of such tool is shown below: