This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Expression Language Injection"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Initial add for EL Injection, CWE 917)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
 
==Risk Factors==
 
==Risk Factors==
  
TBD
+
The likelihood of this issue is '''Medium''', for the following reasons:
 +
*Certain attack scenarios are not overly sophisticated, although require some skill.
 +
*Automated tools may begin to pick up on the pattern, increasing the likelihood of discovery.
 +
*Attackers are highly motivated to discover code execution vulnerabilities.
 +
 
 +
The overall impact of this issue is '''High''', for the following reasons:
 +
* An attacker could modify and invoke functionality on the application server.
 +
* Unauthorized access to data and functionality, as well as account hijacking and remote code execution.
 +
* Confidentiality, and Integrity concerns from a successful attack.
  
 
==Examples==
 
==Examples==

Revision as of 19:21, 15 April 2013

This is a Vulnerability. To view all vulnerabilities, please see the Vulnerability Category page.


Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 04/15/2013

Vulnerabilities Table of Contents

Description

Expression Language (EL) Injection happens when attacker controlled data enters an EL interpreter.

With EL implementations prior to 2.2, attacker can recover sensitive server side information available through implicit objects. This includes model objects, beans, session scope, application scope, etc. The EL 2.2 spec allows method invocation, which permits an attacker to execute arbitrary code within context of the application. This can manipulate application functionality, expose sensitive data, and branch out into system code access-- posing a risk of server compromise.

A specific pattern exists in certain version of the Spring Framework, where Spring JSP tags will double resolve EL. In versions prior to 3.0.6, it is not possible to disable this functionality, and the pattern must be avoided.


Risk Factors

The likelihood of this issue is Medium, for the following reasons:

  • Certain attack scenarios are not overly sophisticated, although require some skill.
  • Automated tools may begin to pick up on the pattern, increasing the likelihood of discovery.
  • Attackers are highly motivated to discover code execution vulnerabilities.

The overall impact of this issue is High, for the following reasons:

  • An attacker could modify and invoke functionality on the application server.
  • Unauthorized access to data and functionality, as well as account hijacking and remote code execution.
  • Confidentiality, and Integrity concerns from a successful attack.

Examples

Spring Message Tag

The Spring Message tag will double resolve Expression Language.

A common pattern of passing URL parameters to the message tag is:

Controller.java

@RequestMapping(value="/")
   String index() {
   	
   	if ( hasErrors() ) {
   		return "redirect:/error?msg=error.generic";
   	} else {
   		return "index";
   	}
   	
   }

error.jsp

<spring:message code="${param.msg}" />

A URL request to the above code of the form:

?msg=${param.test}&test=INJECTION

Will result in the string literal "INJECTION" being passed to the message tag. The application should respond with an exception like:

No message found under code 'INJECTION' for locale 'en_US'

Accordingly, the attacker could submit methods within the EL like:

?msg=${pageContext.request.getSession().setAttribute("admin",true)}


Related Attacks


Related Vulnerabilities

Related Controls

Avoid putting user data into an expression interpreter if possible. Otherwise, validate and/or encode the data to ensure it is not evaluated as expression language.

In the case of Spring Framework, disable the double resolution functionality in versions 3.0.6 and above by placing the following configuration in the application web.xml.

   <context-param>
        <description>Spring Expression Language Support</description>
        <param-name>springJspExpressionSupport</param-name>
        <param-value>false</param-value>
   </context-param>


Related Technical Impacts


References

This article is a stub. You can help OWASP by expanding it or discussing it on its Talk page.