Difference between revisions of "Members Comments On OWASP membership"
From OWASP
Dinis.cruz (talk | contribs) |
Dinis.cruz (talk | contribs) (→Members response to Dinis Cruz email on OWASP Membership) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Members response to Dinis Cruz email on OWASP Membership == | == Members response to Dinis Cruz email on OWASP Membership == | ||
''"To cut the long short: It is not that expensive but it is hard to find too much added value."'' | ''"To cut the long short: It is not that expensive but it is hard to find too much added value."'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''"To be honest, $100/individual/year is too expensive! I pay $119/year for an IEEE membership, and get many tangible benefits (such as insurance group rates, etc) that OWASP can't (and IMO shouldn't) offer -- at near the same cost. Something like $25 or $35 per year would be far more appropriate (similar to SourceForge individual membership)."'' | ||
Revision as of 21:50, 18 December 2006
Members response to Dinis Cruz email on OWASP Membership
"To cut the long short: It is not that expensive but it is hard to find too much added value."
"To be honest, $100/individual/year is too expensive! I pay $119/year for an IEEE membership, and get many tangible benefits (such as insurance group rates, etc) that OWASP can't (and IMO shouldn't) offer -- at near the same cost. Something like $25 or $35 per year would be far more appropriate (similar to SourceForge individual membership)."
