This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Summit 2011 Working Sessions/Session057"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
| summit_session_attendee_name1 = Colin Watson
 
| summit_session_attendee_name1 = Colin Watson
−
| summit_session_attendee_email1 =  
+
| summit_session_attendee_email1 = [email protected]
 
| summit_session_attendee_company1=
 
| summit_session_attendee_company1=
−
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed1=
+
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed1= Consider user concerns too - not just from the business viewpoint / Depends who the "consumers" are too
  
 
| summit_session_attendee_name2 =  
 
| summit_session_attendee_name2 =  
Line 106: Line 106:
 
| summit_track_logo = [[Image:T._metrics.jpg]]
 
| summit_track_logo = [[Image:T._metrics.jpg]]
 
| summit_ws_logo = [[Image:WS._metrics.jpg]]
 
| summit_ws_logo = [[Image:WS._metrics.jpg]]
−
| summit_session_name = Metrics for positive security properties
+
| summit_session_name = Metrics and Labelling
 
| summit_session_url = http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session057
 
| summit_session_url = http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session057
 
| mailing_list =
 
| mailing_list =
  
−
| short_working_session_description=We all know that you can’t control what you can’t measure and that you need to measure the right things or you won’t be steering towards the right outcome. For this session we will define the right outcome as “low risk to an organization from vulnerabilities in applications.” What are the right things to measure? How can we measure them? How can we use these application security metrics to drive towards low application risk. It would also be great if this could be translated into monetary risk to determine if an organizations investment in applications is not too much or too little. Some of the concepts discussed will be to take a portfolio view of application risk, assigning business risk to applications, counting defects, and measuring SDLC process performance.  This is a big unsolved problem so come prepared with ideas and be willing to take part in a discussion.
+
| short_working_session_description= We all know that you can’t control what you can’t measure and that you need to measure the right things or you won’t be steering towards the right outcome. For this session we will define the right outcome as “low risk to an organization from vulnerabilities in applications. ”What are the right things to measure? How can we measure them? How can we use these application security metrics to drive towards low application risk. It would also be great if this could be translated into monetary risk to determine if an organizations investment in applications is not too much or too little. Some of the concepts discussed will be to take a portfolio view of application risk, assigning business risk to applications, counting defects, and measuring SDLC process performance.  This is a big unsolved problem so come prepared with ideas and be willing to take part in a discussion.
  
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 16:38, 20 January 2011

Global Summit 2011 Home Page
Global Summit 2011 Tracks

WS. metrics.jpg Metrics and Labelling
Please see/use the 'discussion' page for more details about this Working Session
Working Sessions Operational Rules - Please see here the general frame of rules.
WORKING SESSION IDENTIFICATION
Short Work Session Description We all know that you can’t control what you can’t measure and that you need to measure the right things or you won’t be steering towards the right outcome. For this session we will define the right outcome as “low risk to an organization from vulnerabilities in applications. ”What are the right things to measure? How can we measure them? How can we use these application security metrics to drive towards low application risk. It would also be great if this could be translated into monetary risk to determine if an organizations investment in applications is not too much or too little. Some of the concepts discussed will be to take a portfolio view of application risk, assigning business risk to applications, counting defects, and measuring SDLC process performance. This is a big unsolved problem so come prepared with ideas and be willing to take part in a discussion.
Related Projects (if any)


Email Contacts & Roles Chair
Chris Wysopal @
Chris Eng @
 Operational Manager
 Mailing list
Subscription Page
WORKING SESSION SPECIFICS
Objectives

Venue/Date&Time/Model Venue/Room
OWASP Global Summit Portugal 2011 		Date & Time


 Discussion Model
participants and attendees

WORKING SESSION OPERATIONAL RESOURCES
Projector, whiteboards, markers, Internet connectivity, power

WORKING SESSION ADDITIONAL DETAILS
WORKING SESSION OUTCOMES / DELIVERABLES
Proposed by Working Group Approved by OWASP Board

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

{{{summit_session_deliverable_name6}}}

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

{{{summit_session_deliverable_name7}}}

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

{{{summit_session_deliverable_name8}}}

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

Working Session Participants

(Add you name by clicking "edit" on the tab on the upper left side of this page)

WORKING SESSION PARTICIPANTS
Name Company Notes & reason for participating, issues to be discussed/addressed
Colin Watson @

Consider user concerns too - not just from the business viewpoint / Depends who the "consumers" are too

























































Retrieved from "https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session057&oldid=101190"