This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2009-11-02"
From OWASP
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* [[:Assessment Criteria v2.0]]/Diagrams to be discussed and sent off to the leaders mailing list | * [[:Assessment Criteria v2.0]]/Diagrams to be discussed and sent off to the leaders mailing list | ||
− | ** [[:File:OWASP-AssessmentDiag.v3.png| | + | ** [[:File:OWASP-AssessmentDiag.v3.png|Assessment 2.0]] |
− | ** [[:File:OWASP-ProjectsDiag.v1.png|Assessment | + | ** [[:File:OWASP-ProjectsDiag.v1.png|Projects Assessment]] |
** [[:File:OWASP-ReleasesDiag.v4.png|Release Assessment]] | ** [[:File:OWASP-ReleasesDiag.v4.png|Release Assessment]] | ||
+ | ---- | ||
− | * | + | *Honorary Membership/New template/Communication problem |
− | * | + | * [https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AX4Puwz7EA41ZGNuODk2MmNfNTRjZGd0OTdkcw&hl=en Proposed Draft to answer M. Boberski] |
− | * | + | * should we address the leaders mailing list as well? |
== From Previous Meeting/Follow up == | == From Previous Meeting/Follow up == | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership: | ||
+ | **Community's adhesion has been very limited if any - See the [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|"OWASP Projects Dashboard"]], | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Spreading [[:Template:OWASP Project Identification Tab|OWASP Project Details Tab]] through [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|ALL OWASP Projects]]. | ||
+ | *Waiting until we (Jason's task?) come up with revised&improved wiki code to link project with release | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
*[[:Summit 2009|"OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"]]/[[:OWASP AppSec DC 2009]]: | *[[:Summit 2009|"OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"]]/[[:OWASP AppSec DC 2009]]: | ||
Line 30: | Line 41: | ||
****We should use a methodology similar to [[OWASP Working Session Top 10 2009|the one we used in the former Summit]], | ****We should use a methodology similar to [[OWASP Working Session Top 10 2009|the one we used in the former Summit]], | ||
****Projects committee should involve the community in determining which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc..... | ****Projects committee should involve the community in determining which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc..... | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 58: | Line 53: | ||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
− | *Meeting started | + | *Meeting started X PM/GMT |
*Add here | *Add here | ||
Revision as of 12:00, 29 October 2009
Previous meetings and Dial-in details
see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda and the Dial-In details
Agenda
Current Meeting
- Assessment Criteria v2.0/Diagrams to be discussed and sent off to the leaders mailing list
- Honorary Membership/New template/Communication problem
- Proposed Draft to answer M. Boberski
- should we address the leaders mailing list as well?
From Previous Meeting/Follow up
- Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership:
- Community's adhesion has been very limited if any - See the "OWASP Projects Dashboard",
- Spreading OWASP Project Details Tab through ALL OWASP Projects.
- Waiting until we (Jason's task?) come up with revised&improved wiki code to link project with release
- "OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"/OWASP AppSec DC 2009:
- Brad's PPT.
- Brad's PPT - Second version
- Issues (revision)we decided last meeting to add to the PPT:
- One slide about review process,
- A reviewers' drive,
- What we ask to all projects
- Maybe a PDF with all diagrams and processes/everything we have,
- What we want from our community,
- SoC,
- We should use a methodology similar to the one we used in the former Summit,
- Projects committee should involve the community in determining which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc.....
- Issues (revision)we decided last meeting to add to the PPT:
- Committee members' evaluation process.
- "GPC - Send 'Individual Committee Member' online form".
Issues for next Meeting
- Add here
Minutes
- Meeting started X PM/GMT
- Add here