This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Testing for LDAP Injection (OTG-INPVAL-006)"
m (→Description of the Issue) |
m (→Example 1. Search Filters) |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
=== Example 1. Search Filters === | === Example 1. Search Filters === | ||
− | Let's suppose we have web application using a search | + | Let's suppose we have a web application using a search |
filter like the following one: | filter like the following one: | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
<nowiki>http://www.example.com/ldapsearch?user=John</nowiki> | <nowiki>http://www.example.com/ldapsearch?user=John</nowiki> | ||
− | If 'John' | + | If the value 'John' is replaced with a '*', |
by sending the request: | by sending the request: | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
searchfilter="(cn=*)" | searchfilter="(cn=*)" | ||
− | which | + | which matches every object with a 'cn' attribute equals to anything. |
− | If the application is vulnerable to LDAP injection | + | If the application is vulnerable to LDAP injection, it will display some or all of the users attributes, depending on the application's execution flow and the permissions of the LDAP connected user, |
− | |||
− | |||
− | A tester could use trial and error approach by inserting | + | A tester could use a trial-and-error approach, by inserting in the parameter |
− | '(', '|', '&', '*' and the other characters in order to check | + | '(', '|', '&', '*' and the other characters, in order to check |
the application for errors. | the application for errors. | ||
Revision as of 23:25, 22 August 2008
[Up]
OWASP Testing Guide v2 Table of Contents
Brief Summary
LDAP is an acronym for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. LDAP is a protocol to store information about users, hosts, and many other objects.
LDAP Injection is a server side attack, which could allow sensitive information about users and hosts represented in an LDAP structure to be disclosed, modified, or inserted.
This is done by manipulating input parameters afterwards passed to internal search, add and modify functions.
Description of the Issue
A web application could use LDAP in order to let users authenticate or search other users information inside a corporate structure.
The goal of LDAP injection attacks is to inject LDAP search filters metacharacters in a query which will be executed by the application.
[Rfc2254] defines a grammar on how to build a search filter on LDAPv3 and extends [Rfc1960] (LDAPv2).
An LDAP search filter is constructed in Polish notation, also known as [prefix notation].
This means that a pseudo code condition on a search filter like this:
find("cn=John & userPassword=mypass")
will be represented as:
find("(&(cn=John)(userPassword=mypass))")
Boolean conditions and group aggregations on an LDAP search filter could be applied by using the following metacharacters:
Metachar | Meaning |
& | Boolean AND |
| | Boolean OR |
! | Boolean NOT |
= | Equals |
~= | Approx |
>= | Greater than |
<= | Less than |
* | Any character |
() | Grouping parenthesis |
More complete examples on how to build a search filter can be found in the related RFC.
A successful exploitation of an LDAP injection vulnerability could allow the tester to:
- Access unauthorized content
- Evade Application restrictions
- Gather unauthorized informations
- Add or modify Objects inside LDAP tree structure.
Black Box testing and example
Example 1. Search Filters
Let's suppose we have a web application using a search filter like the following one:
searchfilter="(cn="+user+")"
which is instantiated by an HTTP request like this:
http://www.example.com/ldapsearch?user=John
If the value 'John' is replaced with a '*', by sending the request:
http://www.example.com/ldapsearch?user=*
the filter will look like:
searchfilter="(cn=*)"
which matches every object with a 'cn' attribute equals to anything.
If the application is vulnerable to LDAP injection, it will display some or all of the users attributes, depending on the application's execution flow and the permissions of the LDAP connected user,
A tester could use a trial-and-error approach, by inserting in the parameter '(', '|', '&', '*' and the other characters, in order to check the application for errors.
Example 2. Login
If a web application uses a vulnerable login page with LDAP query for user credentials, it is possible to bypass the check for user/password presence by injecting an always true LDAP query (in a similar way to SQL and XPATH injection ).
Let's suppose a web application uses a filter to match LDAP user/password pair.
searchlogin= "(&(uid="+user+")(userPassword={MD5}"+base64(pack("H*",md5(pass)))+"))";
By using the following values:
user=*)(uid=*))(|(uid=* pass=password
the search filter will results in:
searchlogin="(&(uid=*)(uid=*))(|(uid=*)(userPassword={MD5}X03MO1qnZdYdgyfeuILPmQ==))";
which is correct and always true. This way the tester will gain logged-in status as the first user in LDAP three.
References
Whitepapers
Sacha Faust: "LDAP Injection" - http://www.spidynamics.com/whitepapers/LDAPinjection.pdf
RFC 1960: "A String Representation of LDAP Search Filters" - http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1960.txt
Bruce Greenblatt: "LDAP Overview" - http://www.directory-applications.com/ldap3_files/frame.htm
IBM paper: "Understanding LDAP" - http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG244986.html
Tools
Softerra LDAP Browser - http://www.ldapadministrator.com/download/index.php
OWASP Testing Guide v2
Here is the OWASP Testing Guide v2 Table of Contents