This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "OWASP Testing Guide v2 Review Panel"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 131: Line 131:
 
** 4.6.11 Buffer overflow Testing (100%) Reviewed by MM. '''Note: these tests are not usual web app tests'''
 
** 4.6.11 Buffer overflow Testing (100%) Reviewed by MM. '''Note: these tests are not usual web app tests'''
 
** 4.6.11.1 Heap overflow (100%) Reviewed by MM
 
** 4.6.11.1 Heap overflow (100%) Reviewed by MM
** 4.6.11.2 Stack overflow (100%)
+
** 4.6.11.2 Stack overflow (100%)Reviewed by MM
** 4.6.11.3 Format string (100%)
+
** 4.6.11.3 Format string (100%)Reviewed by MM
 
** 4.6.12 Incubated vulnerability testing (95%) Reviewed by MM, whitepapers?
 
** 4.6.12 Incubated vulnerability testing (95%) Reviewed by MM, whitepapers?
  
Line 150: Line 150:
  
 
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
* '''4.8 Web Services Testing -->...'''
+
* '''4.8 Web Services Testing --> Matteo Meucci'''
6 of 6 articles to be reviewed (No Keary)
+
6 of 6 articles to be reviewed
 
** 4.8 Web Services Testing (100%)
 
** 4.8 Web Services Testing (100%)
 
** 4.8.1 XML Structural Testing (100%)
 
** 4.8.1 XML Structural Testing (100%)

Revision as of 13:48, 15 November 2006

[Table of Contents]

Update: 15th November, 1.00 (GMT+1)

**********************
Reviewing planning
**********************

The reviewers are: Mark Roxberry, Alberto Revelli, Daniel Cuthbert, Matteo G.P. Flora, Matteo Meucci, Eoin Keary, Stefano Di Paola, James Kist, Vicente Aguilera, Mauro Bregolin, Syed Mohamed A

We can begin the 1st reviewing phase by review all 63 articles (nearly 13 articles per person). The deadline is 15th November at 20.00 (GMT+1) because we have 15th November as 1st deadline for the Autumn of Code Project.

*********************************************
We are waiting for the following articles
*********************************************

4.2.2 Spidering and googling (0%, Tom Brennan, Tom Ryan)
4.2.4.2 DB Listener Testing (0%, Alexander Kornbrust)
4.5.5 HTTP Exploit (0%, Arian J.Evans)
4.6.2.2 Oracle testing (0%,Alexander Kornbrust)
4.6.4 ORM Injection (0%, Mark Roxberry)
5. Writing Reports: value the real risk
5.1 How to value the real risk (50%, Daniel Cuthbert, Matteo Meucci, Sebastien Deleersnyder, Marco Morana)
5.2 How to write the report of the testing (0%, Daniel Cuthbert, Tom Brennan, Tom Ryan)

*********************************************************
Here is the complete list of articles to be reviewed:
********************************************************* _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • Introduction -->...

1 of 1 article to be reviewed -> reviewed by Eoin Keary

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • The OWASP Testing Framework -->...

1 of 1 article to be reviewed

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 4.1 Introduction and objectives -->.EK

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 4.2 Information Gathering (Reviewed by EK) --> Keary

9 of 10 articles to be reviewed ->

  • Application Discovery:
    • Reviewed + updated(EK) (Maybe we should include HTTP methods for application descovery, such as HTTP HEAD command?)
  • Analysis of error codes:
    • Reviewed + updated(EK)
  • Infrastructure configuration management testing AoC:
    • Reviewed by EK. Not in typical guide structure
  • SSL/TLS Testing AoC:
    • Reviewed + updated(EK)
  • DB Listener Testing:
    • Incomplete
  • Application configuration management testing:
    • Reviewed by EK. Not typical guide structure
    • This is generally a "white box" section. There are no examples of testing the configuration from a remote perspective. If this was the aim of the document, thats fine. - Need feedback on this one!!
    • Sample/known files and directories: might be good to refer to http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Old_file_testing_AoC ??
    • Logging: Timestamp is also important
  • File extensions handling
    • contains the text: "...To review and expand..." - Is this complete??
    • Need a second opinion on this one!! :)
  • Old file testing: Reviewed by EK


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 4.3 Business logic testing -->...

1 of 1 article to be reviewed

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 4.4 Authentication Testing --> Roxberry

0 of 7 articles to be reviewed


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 4.5 Session Management Testing --> Syed Mohamed A

5 of 6 articles to be reviewed

    • 4.5 Session Management Testing (95%)
    • 4.5.1 Analysis of the Session Management Schema (90%)
    • 4.5.2 Cookie and Session token Manipulation (100%)
    • 4.5.3 Exposed session variables (90%)
    • 4.5.4 Session Riding (XSRF) (80%)
    • 4.5.5 HTTP Exploit (0%)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 4.6 Data Validation Testing --> Meucci

18 of 21 articles to be reviewed

    • 4.6 Data Validation Testing : Reviewed by EK
    • 4.6.1 Cross site scripting: Reviewed by EK (Reformatted it slightly with wiki tags). Not completed
    • 4.6.1.1 HTTP Methods and XST Reviewed by MM
    • 4.6.2 SQL Injection (90%) Reviewed by MM. Reviewed by EK
      • Not sure about "inferential" injection definition in "Description of Issue"
      • Added some reference to Oracle. Corrected English.
    • 4.6.2.1 Stored procedure injection (40%) TD (not enough informations)
    • 4.6.2.2 Oracle testing (0%) TD (not enough informations)
    • 4.6.2.3 MySQL testing (100%) Reviewed by MM
    • 4.6.2.4 SQL Server testing (95%) Reviewed by MM. tools?
    • 4.6.3 LDAP Injection (90%) Reviewed by MM added wp and tools
    • 4.6.4 ORM Injection (0%) TD (not enough informations)
    • 4.6.5 XML Injection (90%) Reviwed and updated by MM. WP and tools?
    • 4.6.6 SSI Injection (95%) Reviewed by MM
    • 4.6.7 XPath Injection (80%) Reviewed by MM. Gray box to complete?
    • 4.6.8 IMAP/SMTP Injection (95%)Reviewed by MM
    • 4.6.9 Code Injection (70%) Reviewed by MM. Not completed
    • 4.6.10 OS Commanding (70%) Reviewed by MM. Not completed
    • 4.6.11 Buffer overflow Testing (100%) Reviewed by MM. Note: these tests are not usual web app tests
    • 4.6.11.1 Heap overflow (100%) Reviewed by MM
    • 4.6.11.2 Stack overflow (100%)Reviewed by MM
    • 4.6.11.3 Format string (100%)Reviewed by MM
    • 4.6.12 Incubated vulnerability testing (95%) Reviewed by MM, whitepapers?

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


  • 4.7 Denial of Service Testing

8 of 8 articles Reviewed

    • 4.7 Denial of Service Testing 100% Reviewed by Revelli
    • 4.7.1 Locking Customer Accounts 100% Reviewd by Revelli
    • 4.7.2 Buffer Overflows 100% Reviewd by Revelli
    • 4.7.3 User Specified Object Allocation 100% Reviewd by Revelli
    • 4.7.4 User Input as a Loop Counter 100% Reviewd by Revelli
    • 4.7.5 Writing User Provided Data to Disk 100% Reviewd by Revelli
    • 4.7.6 Failure to Release Resources 100% Reviewd by Revelli
    • 4.7.7 Storing too Much Data in Session 100% Reviewd by Revelli

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 4.8 Web Services Testing --> Matteo Meucci

6 of 6 articles to be reviewed

    • 4.8 Web Services Testing (100%)
    • 4.8.1 XML Structural Testing (100%)
    • 4.8.2 XML content-level Testing (90%)
    • 4.8.3 HTTP GET parameters/REST Testing (100%)
    • 4.8.4 Naughty SOAP attachments (95%)
    • 4.8.5 Replay Testing (95%)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 4.9 AJAX Testing --> Roxberry

3 of 3 articles to be reviewed (No Di Paola)

    • 4.9 AJAX Testing (70%)
    • 4.9.1 Vulnerabilities (60%)
    • 4.9.2 How to test (60%)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 5. Writing Reports: value the real risk

We have to write about it. I consider it not yet finished. O of 3 articles to be reviewed.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • Appendix A: Testing Tools -->...

1 article of 1: need to update it searching all the guide for paragraps: tools

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • Appendix B: Suggested Reading -->...

1 article of 1: need to update it searching all the guide for paragraps: tools

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • Appendix C: Fuzz Vectors -->...

1 article of 1: Need to be updated

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

*************************
Reviewers Rules
*************************

1) Check the english language
2) Check the template: the articles on chapter 4 should have the following:

In some articles we don't need to talk about Gray Box Testing or other, so we can eliminate it.

3) Check the reference style. (I'd like to have all the referenced URLs visible because I have to produce also a pdf document of the Guide). I agree with Stefano, we have to use a reference like that:

== References ==

'''Whitepapers'''<br>

* [1] Author1, Author2: "Title" - http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2254.txt<br>

* [2]...<br>

'''Tools'''<br>

* Francois Larouche: "Multiple DBMS Sql Injection tool" - http://www.sqlpowerinjector.com/index.htm <br>

4) Check the reference with the other articles of the guide or with the other OWASP Project.

5) Other?