This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Projects/Top 10/Releases/2010/Assessment"
Dinis.cruz (talk | contribs) (Created page with ' <small>[[{{{project_home_page}}}|Click here to return to project's main page]]</small><br> == Release Review of the {{{project_name}}} - {{{release_name}}} Release == ==== Pro…') |
Dinis.cruz (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <small>[[Top_10|Click here to return to project's main page]]</small><br> | ||
| − | + | == Release Review of the OWASP Top 10 - 2010 Release == | |
| − | |||
| − | == Release Review of the | ||
==== Project Leader for this Release ==== | ==== Project Leader for this Release ==== | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''[[:User:Wichers|Dave Wichers]]'s Pre-Assessment Checklist:''' |
==Project Leader review== | ==Project Leader review== | ||
| Line 60: | Line 59: | ||
==== First Reviewer ==== | ==== First Reviewer ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''''[[user:name|TBD]]'s Review:''''' | ||
== First Reviewer == | == First Reviewer == | ||
| − | |||
<small>Ideally, reviewers should be an existing OWASP project leader or chapter leader.</small> | <small>Ideally, reviewers should be an existing OWASP project leader or chapter leader.</small> | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
==== Second Reviewer ==== | ==== Second Reviewer ==== | ||
| − | '''''[[User:Jason Li|Jason Li]]'s Review:''''' | + | '''''[[User:Jason Li|Jason Li]]'s Review:''''' |
| + | |||
| + | == Second Reviewer== | ||
| + | |||
<small>It is recommended that an OWASP board member or Global Projects Committee member be the second reviewer on Quality releases. The board has the initial option to review the project, followed by the Global Projects Committee.</small> | <small>It is recommended that an OWASP board member or Global Projects Committee member be the second reviewer on Quality releases. The board has the initial option to review the project, followed by the Global Projects Committee.</small> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:10, 10 May 2010
Click here to return to project's main page
Release Review of the OWASP Top 10 - 2010 Release
Project Leader for this Release
Dave Wichers's Pre-Assessment Checklist:
Project Leader review
(This FORM is EDITED via a template)
| Alpha level |
|
1. Is this release associated with a project containing at least the Project Wiki Page Minimum Content information? answer 1 |
|
2. Is your document licensed under a free and open license? (see Project Licensing section of the Guidelines for OWASP Projects) Please point out the link(s). answer 2 |
|
3. Is the document available as a PDF (Portable Document Format) and an editable (.Doc) format on the project site? Please point out the link(s). answer 3 |
|
4. Are all articles that constitute the project release properly tagged within project category and available from main project Wiki page? Please point out the link(s). answer 4 |
|
5. Is there a roadmap for this project release which will take it from Alpha to Stable release? Please point out the link(s). answer 5 |
| Beta Level |
|
6. Are the Alpha pre-assessment items complete? answer 6 |
|
7. Are all document contents (articles) present and listed on the OWASP project wiki page? Please point out the link(s). answer 7 |
|
8. Is there user documentation on the OWASP project wiki page? Please point out the link(s). answer 8 |
|
9. Is there an “About This Document” section in the document listing: (Please point out the link(s).
answer 9 |
|
10. Is there documentation on how to build the tool from source including obtaining the source from the code repository? Please point out the link(s). answer 10 |
| Stable Level |
|
11. Are the Alpha and Beta pre-assessment items complete? answer 11 |
|
12. Have any limitations been documented? Please point out the link(s). answer 12 |
|
13. Does the document consider OWASP Writing Style answer 13 |
|
14. Is there a one sheet overview document about the project release? Please point out the link(s). answer 14 |
|
15. Is the document in a format which can be converted to an OWASP book? (books are currently via Lulu.com) Please point out the link(s). answer 15 |
First Reviewer
TBD's Review:
First Reviewer
Ideally, reviewers should be an existing OWASP project leader or chapter leader.
(This FORM is EDITED via a template)
| Beta level |
|
1. Does the document consider the OWASP Writing Style? answer 1 |
|
2. Do contents from wiki articles match download-able documents? (PDF and .doc versions) answer 2 |
|
3. Does the document have an “About This Document” section which allows the end user to get an overview of the state of the document? answer 3 |
|
4. How completely does the release address the goal of the project? Is the overall document complete in structure and organization? Are any missing or incomplete sections critical enough to keep the document at an Alpha quality level? answer 4 |
| Stable Level |
|
5. Have all the Beta Reviewer Action Items been completed? These will need to be completed if they have not already occurred during a previous assessment. answer 5 |
|
6. Have any limitations been documented? Please point out the link(s). answer 6 |
|
7. Does the document substantially address the application security issues it was created to solve? answer 7 |
|
8. Does the document respect OWASP Writing Style answer 8 |
|
9. Have you noted any limitations of the document that are not already documented by the project release lead? answer 9 |
|
10. Would you consider using this document in your day to day work assuming your professional work includes a reason to use this document? Would you recommend this document to others in the profession? Why or why not? answer 10 |
|
11. What, if anything, is missing which would make this a more useful document? Is what is missing critical enough to keep the release at a beta quality? answer 11 |
Second Reviewer
Jason Li's Review:
Second Reviewer
It is recommended that an OWASP board member or Global Projects Committee member be the second reviewer on Quality releases. The board has the initial option to review the project, followed by the Global Projects Committee.
(This FORM is EDITED via a template)
| Beta level |
|
1. Does the document consider the OWASP Writing Style? answer 1 |
|
2. Do contents from wiki articles match download-able documents? (PDF and .doc versions) answer 2 |
|
3. Does the document have an “About This Document” section which allows the end user to get an overview of the state of the document? answer 3 |
|
4. How completely does the release address the goal of the project? Is the overall document complete in structure and organization? Are any missing or incomplete sections critical enough to keep the document at an Alpha quality level? answer 4 |
| Stable Level |
|
5. Have all the Beta Reviewer Action Items been completed? These will need to be completed if they have not already occurred during a previous assessment. answer 5 |
|
6. Have any limitations been documented? Please point out the link(s). answer 6 |
|
7. Does the document substantially address the application security issues it was created to solve? answer 7 |
|
8. Does the document respect OWASP Writing Style answer 8 |
|
9. Have you noted any limitations of the document that are not already documented by the project release lead? answer 9 |
|
10. Would you consider using this document in your day to day work assuming your professional work includes a reason to use this document? Would you recommend this document to others in the profession? Why or why not? answer 10 |
|
11. What, if anything, is missing which would make this a more useful document? Is what is missing critical enough to keep the release at a beta quality? answer 11 |
