This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Unsafe Mobile Code: Inner Class"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Contents provided by Fortify.)
 
(Reverting to last version not containing links to www.textchizelolob.com)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Vulnerability}}
+
{{template:CandidateForDeletion}}
{{Template:Fortify}}
 
  
==Abstract==
+
#REDIRECT [[Unsafe Mobile Code]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}'''
  
The program violates secure coding principles for mobile code by making use of an inner class.
 
  
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
 +
 +
The program violates secure coding principles for mobile code by making use of an inner class.
  
 
Inner classes quietly introduce several security concerns because of the way they are translated into Java bytecode. In Java source code, it appears that an inner class can be declared to be accessible only by the enclosing class, but Java bytecode has no concept of an inner class, so the compiler must transform an inner class declaration into a peer class with package level access to the original outer class. More insidiously, since an inner class can access private fields in their enclosing class, once an inner class becomes a peer class in bytecode, the compiler converts private fields accessed by the inner class into protected fields.
 
Inner classes quietly introduce several security concerns because of the way they are translated into Java bytecode. In Java source code, it appears that an inner class can be declared to be accessible only by the enclosing class, but Java bytecode has no concept of an inner class, so the compiler must transform an inner class declaration into a peer class with package level access to the original outer class. More insidiously, since an inner class can access private fields in their enclosing class, once an inner class becomes a peer class in bytecode, the compiler converts private fields accessed by the inner class into protected fields.
  
==Examples ==
+
For more details about mobile code and its security concerns, please see [[:Category:Unsafe Mobile Code]].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Risk Factors==
 +
 
 +
TBD
 +
 
 +
==Examples==
  
 
The following Java Applet code mistakenly makes use of an inner class.
 
The following Java Applet code mistakenly makes use of an inner class.
Line 23: Line 34:
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
  
Mobile code, in this case a Java Applet, is code that is transmitted across a network and executed on a remote machine. Because mobile code developers have little if any control of the environment in which their code will execute, special security concerns become relevant. One of the biggest environmental threats results from the risk that the mobile code will run side-by-side with other, potentially malicious, mobile code. Because all of the popular web browsers execute code from multiple sources together in the same JVM, many of the security guidelines for mobile code are focused on preventing manipulation of your objects' state and behavior by adversaries who have access to the same virtual machine where your program is running.
+
==Related [[Attacks]]==
 +
 
 +
* [[Attack 1]]
 +
* [[Attack 2]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Related [[Vulnerabilities]]==
 +
 
 +
* [[Vulnerability 1]]
 +
* [[Vulnerabiltiy 2]]
  
==Related Principles==
 
  
[[Use encapsulation]]
 
  
==Related Threats==
+
==Related [[Controls]]==
  
==Related Attacks==
+
* [[Use encapsulation]]
  
==Related Vulnerabilities==
 
  
==Related Countermeasures==
+
==Related [[Technical Impacts]]==
  
==Categories==
+
* [[Technical Impact 1]]
 +
* [[Technical Impact 2]]
  
[[Category:Code Quality Vulnerability]]
 
  
[[Category:Access Control Vulnerability]]
+
==References==
  
[[Category:Java]]
+
TBD
  
[[Category:Implementation]]
 
  
[[Category:Code Snippet]]
+
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 18:29, 27 May 2009

Template:CandidateForDeletion

#REDIRECT Unsafe Mobile Code


Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 05/27/2009


Description

The program violates secure coding principles for mobile code by making use of an inner class.

Inner classes quietly introduce several security concerns because of the way they are translated into Java bytecode. In Java source code, it appears that an inner class can be declared to be accessible only by the enclosing class, but Java bytecode has no concept of an inner class, so the compiler must transform an inner class declaration into a peer class with package level access to the original outer class. More insidiously, since an inner class can access private fields in their enclosing class, once an inner class becomes a peer class in bytecode, the compiler converts private fields accessed by the inner class into protected fields.

For more details about mobile code and its security concerns, please see Category:Unsafe Mobile Code.


Risk Factors

TBD

Examples

The following Java Applet code mistakenly makes use of an inner class.

	public final class urlTool extends Applet {
		private final class urlHelper {
			...
		}
		...
	}

Related Attacks


Related Vulnerabilities


Related Controls


Related Technical Impacts


References

TBD