This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2009-10-19"
From OWASP
(→From Previous Meeting/Follow up) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
*Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership: | *Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership: | ||
**Community's adhesion has been very limited if any - See the [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|"OWASP Projects Dashboard"]], | **Community's adhesion has been very limited if any - See the [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|"OWASP Projects Dashboard"]], | ||
| − | **It seems we haven't been clear and confused project leaders with the distinction between "contributors" and ""past_leaders_special_contributions" | + | **It seems we haven't been clear and confused project leaders with the distinction between "contributors" and ""past_leaders_special_contributions" - Action must be taken. |
| − | + | ** We need to add a column in the [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|"OWASP Projects Dashboard"]] to show "current" contributors. | |
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
***The single page would show the progression of the project to external audiences | ***The single page would show the progression of the project to external audiences | ||
***Makes the release roadmap very similar to a changelog - which is more useful if its in one place rather then in bits attached to releases. | ***Makes the release roadmap very similar to a changelog - which is more useful if its in one place rather then in bits attached to releases. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 14:56, 21 October 2009
Previous meetings and Dial-in details
see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda and the Dial-In details
Agenda
Current Meeting
- New Assessment Criteria
- Release Assessment
From Previous Meeting/Follow up
- "OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"/OWASP AppSec DC 2009:
- Brad's PPT.
- Brad's PPT - Second version
- Issues (revision)we decided last meeting to add to the PPT:
- One slide about review process,
- A reviewers' drive,
- What we ask to all projects
- Maybe a PDF with all diagrams and processes/everything we have,
- What we want from our community,
- SoC,
- We should use a methodology similar to the one we used in the former Summit,
- Projects committee should involve the community in determining which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc.....
- Issues (revision)we decided last meeting to add to the PPT:
- Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership:
- Community's adhesion has been very limited if any - See the "OWASP Projects Dashboard",
- It seems we haven't been clear and confused project leaders with the distinction between "contributors" and ""past_leaders_special_contributions" - Action must be taken.
- We need to add a column in the "OWASP Projects Dashboard" to show "current" contributors.
- Spreading OWASP Project Details Tab through ALL OWASP Projects.
- Waiting until we (Jason's task?) come up with revised&improved wiki code to either link project with release and to consider the below referred,
- Consider having a single release roadmap page that is not attached to a single version but instead is the summation of the various release roadmaps.
- The single page is easier for project leaders to find/edit
- The single page would show the progression of the project to external audiences
- Makes the release roadmap very similar to a changelog - which is more useful if its in one place rather then in bits attached to releases.
- Consider having a single release roadmap page that is not attached to a single version but instead is the summation of the various release roadmaps.
- Committee members' evaluation process.
- "GPC - Send 'Individual Committee Member' online form".
Issues for next Meeting
- Add here
Minutes
- Meeting started 10PM/GMT+1
- Add here
