This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2009-10-05"
From OWASP
m (moved GPC Agenda 2009-10-25 to GPC Agenda 2009-10-05) |
(Added 1 item to the agenda) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership. | *Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership. | ||
− | ** See the [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|"OWASP Projects Dashboard"]] with all the OWASP Projects | + | ** See the [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|"OWASP Projects Dashboard"]] with all the OWASP Projects, |
− | ** | + | ** [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/Doc?id=dcn8962c_51ftpmj2g7 Email/draft to be sent to all OWASP leaders]. |
---- | ---- | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
*** Methodology to fill in the referred tab? | *** Methodology to fill in the referred tab? | ||
*** Methodology to link the tab to each project? | *** Methodology to link the tab to each project? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Consider having a single release roadmap page that is not attached to a single version but instead is the summation of the various release roadmaps. | ||
+ | ** The single page is easier for project leaders to find/edit | ||
+ | ** The single page would show the progression of the project to external audiences | ||
+ | ** Makes the release roadmap very similar to a changelog - which is more useful if its in one place rather then in bits attached to releases. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 43: | Line 50: | ||
* Update on the conversation between Sebastien and Matt. | * Update on the conversation between Sebastien and Matt. | ||
+ | * Start discussion on changing current Wikimedia to a more professional solution: | ||
+ | ** http://www.wikimatrix.org/compare/Swirrl+Confluence+PBwiki+CentralDesktop | ||
+ | ** http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/pricing.jsp?type=nonprofit | ||
= Issues for next Meeting = | = Issues for next Meeting = |
Latest revision as of 20:12, 5 October 2009
Previous meetings and Dial-in details
see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda and the Dial-In details
Agenda
From Previous Meeting/Follow up
- New Assessment Criteria
- Pravir's assessment diagram - Note that this is not related to 'Project Releases' but to 'Project Health'
- We need to create a separate diagram to help our project leaders to understand the desired workflow for Releases (which go from Alpha, to Beta, to Stable)
- Modification of Assessment Criteria v2 (ACv2)
- Review of email templates to reflect any changes from above.
- Pravir's assessment diagram - Note that this is not related to 'Project Releases' but to 'Project Health'
- Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership.
- See the "OWASP Projects Dashboard" with all the OWASP Projects,
- Email/draft to be sent to all OWASP leaders.
- Spreading OWASP Project Details Tab through ALL OWASP Projects.
- ALL the projects with defined leadership already HAVE the GPC Project Details Tab - Check out "OWASP Projects Dashboard",
- Methodology to fill in the referred tab?
- Methodology to link the tab to each project?
- ALL the projects with defined leadership already HAVE the GPC Project Details Tab - Check out "OWASP Projects Dashboard",
- Consider having a single release roadmap page that is not attached to a single version but instead is the summation of the various release roadmaps.
- The single page is easier for project leaders to find/edit
- The single page would show the progression of the project to external audiences
- Makes the release roadmap very similar to a changelog - which is more useful if its in one place rather then in bits attached to releases.
- Projects committee should determine which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc.....
- Matt Tesauro's draft to deal with this kind of issues.
- Committee members' evaluation process.
- "GPC - Send 'Individual Committee Member' online form".
Current Meeting
- Update on the conversation between Sebastien and Matt.
- Start discussion on changing current Wikimedia to a more professional solution:
Issues for next Meeting
- Add here
Minutes
- Meeting started 10PM/GMT+1
- Add here