This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template JSP Testing Tool Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"
Fabriciofuji (talk | contribs) |
Fabriciofuji (talk | contribs) (Final review) |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
| − | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Considering the reviewer received a ZIP package with all required files needed to run the application, the "stand alone executable version" | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Considering the reviewer received a ZIP package with all required files needed to run the application, all requirements, including the "stand alone executable version", may be considered fullfilled. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
Latest revision as of 23:14, 4 March 2009
Clik here to return to the previous page.
| FINAL REVIEW | ||
|---|---|---|
| PART I | ||
|
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
Design documentation, code, and user documentation have been completed. Performance needs tunning, but the display of incremental progress improved significantly the perception of performance. | |
|
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
90% | |
|
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
The tests were run in FireFox 3.0.5, Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 and Internet Explorer 7.0.6. They were completed successfully only in FireFox 3.0.5. | |
| PART II | ||
|
Assessment Criteria |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
None | |
|
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
Considering the reviewer received a ZIP package with all required files needed to run the application, all requirements, including the "stand alone executable version", may be considered fullfilled. | |
|
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
N/A | |
|
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Great job! | |
