This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Talk:December 9, 2015"
(Created page with "'''Josh Sokol''' A few comments: 1) Yes, I would still like to discuss the proposal to eliminate the "At Large" positions. I still believe that the Board is doing a crappy j...") |
Paul Ritchie (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
2) Given that we are expecting to hear from Simon, Johanna, and others regarding the Benchmark, is it really expected to take only 5-10 minutes? I would anticipate no less than 30. | 2) Given that we are expecting to hear from Simon, Johanna, and others regarding the Benchmark, is it really expected to take only 5-10 minutes? I would anticipate no less than 30. | ||
| + | PLR = OK with adding more time here, especially if we are ensuring there is time to hear from Community Members, Simon, Johanna, others. | ||
| − | 3) With respect to the wiki editor, don't we have consensus on needing to do this? If we have a proposal, I think it would be really easy to push this one offline. It's also on the agenda twice. | + | 3) With respect to the wiki editor, don't we have consensus on needing to do this? If we have a proposal, I think it would be really easy to push this one offline. It's also on the agenda twice. |
| + | PLR - Yes, prior discussions were in budget range of $20K. So when current proposal for >60K Euros popped up, it causes a moment of pause to assess where the miscommunication came from. Paul is proponent of contracting for HALF the 60K figure and 'working hard' to stimulate volunteers to complete the other half, even if it is Students....who get a Free pass to our AppSec Conference for their efforts! Incentives like that might help. | ||
4) In reviewing the "Summary Report AppSecUSA-San Francisco 2015", I noted that my name wasn't listed as a Board member attending the conference. All Board members were in attendance and I would like it updated to reflect that I was there as well. | 4) In reviewing the "Summary Report AppSecUSA-San Francisco 2015", I noted that my name wasn't listed as a Board member attending the conference. All Board members were in attendance and I would like it updated to reflect that I was there as well. | ||
Latest revision as of 04:37, 7 December 2015
Josh Sokol A few comments:
1) Yes, I would still like to discuss the proposal to eliminate the "At Large" positions. I still believe that the Board is doing a crappy job of engaging with respect to Chapters, Projects, and Governance and would like to see individuals tasked with these duties. There is nothing preventing them from doing other stuff as well, but we lack focus in these areas and desperately need it. That said, this may fit into the "Discussion of Board duties, roles and responsibilities, and improving the effectiveness of future Board meetings" discussion proposed by Andrew.
2) Given that we are expecting to hear from Simon, Johanna, and others regarding the Benchmark, is it really expected to take only 5-10 minutes? I would anticipate no less than 30. PLR = OK with adding more time here, especially if we are ensuring there is time to hear from Community Members, Simon, Johanna, others.
3) With respect to the wiki editor, don't we have consensus on needing to do this? If we have a proposal, I think it would be really easy to push this one offline. It's also on the agenda twice. PLR - Yes, prior discussions were in budget range of $20K. So when current proposal for >60K Euros popped up, it causes a moment of pause to assess where the miscommunication came from. Paul is proponent of contracting for HALF the 60K figure and 'working hard' to stimulate volunteers to complete the other half, even if it is Students....who get a Free pass to our AppSec Conference for their efforts! Incentives like that might help.
4) In reviewing the "Summary Report AppSecUSA-San Francisco 2015", I noted that my name wasn't listed as a Board member attending the conference. All Board members were in attendance and I would like it updated to reflect that I was there as well.
