This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Test for Process Timing (OTG-BUSLOGIC-004)"
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:OWASP Testing Guide v4}} | {{Template:OWASP Testing Guide v4}} | ||
− | == | + | == Summary == |
It is possible that attackers can gather information on an application by monitoring the time it takes to complete a task or give a respond. Additionally, attackers may be able to manipulate and break designed business process flows by simply keeping active sessions open and not submitting their transactions in the "expected" time frame. | It is possible that attackers can gather information on an application by monitoring the time it takes to complete a task or give a respond. Additionally, attackers may be able to manipulate and break designed business process flows by simply keeping active sessions open and not submitting their transactions in the "expected" time frame. | ||
+ | |||
Process timing logic vulnerabilities is unique in that these manual misuse cases should be created considering execution and transaction timing that are application/system specific. | Process timing logic vulnerabilities is unique in that these manual misuse cases should be created considering execution and transaction timing that are application/system specific. | ||
− | |||
Processing timing may give/leak information on what is being done in the application/system background processes. If an application allows users to guess what the particulate next outcome will be by processing time variations, users will be able to adjust accordingly and change behavior based on the expectation and "game the system". | Processing timing may give/leak information on what is being done in the application/system background processes. If an application allows users to guess what the particulate next outcome will be by processing time variations, users will be able to adjust accordingly and change behavior based on the expectation and "game the system". | ||
+ | |||
== Example == | == Example == | ||
− | |||
Example 1 | Example 1 | ||
Video gambling/slot machines may take longer to process a transaction just prior to a large payout. This would allow astute gamblers to gamble minimum amounts until they see the long process time which would then prompt them to bet the maximum. | Video gambling/slot machines may take longer to process a transaction just prior to a large payout. This would allow astute gamblers to gamble minimum amounts until they see the long process time which would then prompt them to bet the maximum. | ||
+ | |||
Example 2 | Example 2 | ||
Many system log on processes ask for the user name and password. If you look closely you may be able to see that entering an invalid user name and invalid user password takes more time to return an error than entering a valid username and invalid user password. This may allow the attacker to know if they have a valid username and not need to rely on the GUI message. | Many system log on processes ask for the user name and password. If you look closely you may be able to see that entering an invalid user name and invalid user password takes more time to return an error than entering a valid username and invalid user password. This may allow the attacker to know if they have a valid username and not need to rely on the GUI message. | ||
+ | |||
Example 3 | Example 3 | ||
Most Arenas or travel agencies have ticketing applications that allow users to purchase tickets and reserve seats. When the user requests the tickets seats are locked or reserved pending payment. What if an attacker keeps reserving seats but not checking out? Will the seats be released, or will no tickets be sold? Some ticket vendors now only allow users 5 minutes to complete a transaction or the transaction is invalidated. | Most Arenas or travel agencies have ticketing applications that allow users to purchase tickets and reserve seats. When the user requests the tickets seats are locked or reserved pending payment. What if an attacker keeps reserving seats but not checking out? Will the seats be released, or will no tickets be sold? Some ticket vendors now only allow users 5 minutes to complete a transaction or the transaction is invalidated. | ||
+ | |||
Example 4 | Example 4 | ||
Line 30: | Line 33: | ||
Suppose a precious metals e-commerce site allows users to make purchases with a price quote based on market price at the time they log on. What if an attacker logs on and places an order but does not complete the transaction until later in the day only of the price of the metals goes up? Will the attacker get the initial lower price? | Suppose a precious metals e-commerce site allows users to make purchases with a price quote based on market price at the time they log on. What if an attacker logs on and places an order but does not complete the transaction until later in the day only of the price of the metals goes up? Will the attacker get the initial lower price? | ||
− | == | + | |
+ | == How to Test == | ||
• Review the project documentation and use exploratory testing looking for application/system functionality that may be impacted by time. Such as execution time or actions that help users predict a future outcome or allow one to circumvent any part of the business logic or workflow. For example, not completing transactions in an expected time. | • Review the project documentation and use exploratory testing looking for application/system functionality that may be impacted by time. Such as execution time or actions that help users predict a future outcome or allow one to circumvent any part of the business logic or workflow. For example, not completing transactions in an expected time. | ||
Line 36: | Line 40: | ||
• Develop and execute the mis-use cases ensuring that attackers can not gain an advantage based on any timing. | • Develop and execute the mis-use cases ensuring that attackers can not gain an advantage based on any timing. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Related Test Cases == | == Related Test Cases == | ||
− | + | [[Testing for cookies attributes (OTG-SESS-002)| Testing for Cookies attributes (OTG-SESS-002)]] | |
− | + | [[Test Session Timeout (OTG-SESS-007)| Test Session Timeout (OTG-SESS-007)]] | |
− | |||
− | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
None | None | ||
+ | |||
== Remediation == | == Remediation == | ||
Develop applications with processing time in mind. If attackers could possibly gain some type of advantage from knowing the different processing times and results add extra steps or processing so that no matter the results they are provided in the same time frame. | Develop applications with processing time in mind. If attackers could possibly gain some type of advantage from knowing the different processing times and results add extra steps or processing so that no matter the results they are provided in the same time frame. | ||
+ | |||
Additionally, the application/system must have mechanism in place to not allow attackers to extend transactions over an "acceptable" amount of time. This may be done by cancelling or resetting transactions after a specified amount of time has passed like some ticket vendors are now using. | Additionally, the application/system must have mechanism in place to not allow attackers to extend transactions over an "acceptable" amount of time. This may be done by cancelling or resetting transactions after a specified amount of time has passed like some ticket vendors are now using. |
Latest revision as of 13:07, 8 August 2014
This article is part of the new OWASP Testing Guide v4.
Back to the OWASP Testing Guide v4 ToC: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Guide_v4_Table_of_Contents Back to the OWASP Testing Guide Project: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Testing_Project
Summary
It is possible that attackers can gather information on an application by monitoring the time it takes to complete a task or give a respond. Additionally, attackers may be able to manipulate and break designed business process flows by simply keeping active sessions open and not submitting their transactions in the "expected" time frame.
Process timing logic vulnerabilities is unique in that these manual misuse cases should be created considering execution and transaction timing that are application/system specific.
Processing timing may give/leak information on what is being done in the application/system background processes. If an application allows users to guess what the particulate next outcome will be by processing time variations, users will be able to adjust accordingly and change behavior based on the expectation and "game the system".
Example
Example 1
Video gambling/slot machines may take longer to process a transaction just prior to a large payout. This would allow astute gamblers to gamble minimum amounts until they see the long process time which would then prompt them to bet the maximum.
Example 2
Many system log on processes ask for the user name and password. If you look closely you may be able to see that entering an invalid user name and invalid user password takes more time to return an error than entering a valid username and invalid user password. This may allow the attacker to know if they have a valid username and not need to rely on the GUI message.
Example 3
Most Arenas or travel agencies have ticketing applications that allow users to purchase tickets and reserve seats. When the user requests the tickets seats are locked or reserved pending payment. What if an attacker keeps reserving seats but not checking out? Will the seats be released, or will no tickets be sold? Some ticket vendors now only allow users 5 minutes to complete a transaction or the transaction is invalidated.
Example 4
Suppose a precious metals e-commerce site allows users to make purchases with a price quote based on market price at the time they log on. What if an attacker logs on and places an order but does not complete the transaction until later in the day only of the price of the metals goes up? Will the attacker get the initial lower price?
How to Test
• Review the project documentation and use exploratory testing looking for application/system functionality that may be impacted by time. Such as execution time or actions that help users predict a future outcome or allow one to circumvent any part of the business logic or workflow. For example, not completing transactions in an expected time.
• Develop and execute the mis-use cases ensuring that attackers can not gain an advantage based on any timing.
Related Test Cases
Testing for Cookies attributes (OTG-SESS-002)
Test Session Timeout (OTG-SESS-007)
References
None
Remediation
Develop applications with processing time in mind. If attackers could possibly gain some type of advantage from knowing the different processing times and results add extra steps or processing so that no matter the results they are provided in the same time frame.
Additionally, the application/system must have mechanism in place to not allow attackers to extend transactions over an "acceptable" amount of time. This may be done by cancelling or resetting transactions after a specified amount of time has passed like some ticket vendors are now using.