This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Summit 2011 Working Sessions/Session058"
From OWASP
Sarah Baso (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| summit_session_name = Counting and scoring application security defects | | summit_session_name = Counting and scoring application security defects | ||
− | | summit_session_url = http://www.owasp.org/index.php/ | + | | summit_session_url = http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session058 |
| short_working_session_description= We all know that you can’t control what you can’t measure and that you need to measure the right things or you won’t be steering towards the right outcome. For this session we will define the right outcome as “low risk to an organization from vulnerabilities in applications.” What are the right things to measure? How can we measure them? How can we use these application security metrics to drive towards low application risk. It would also be great if this could be translated into monetary risk to determine if an organizations investment in applications is not too much or too little. Some of the concepts discussed will be to take a portfolio view of application risk, assigning business risk to applications, counting defects, and measuring SDLC process performance. This is a big unsolved problem so come prepared with ideas and be willing to take part in a discussion. Includes discussion of CWSS 0.1. | | short_working_session_description= We all know that you can’t control what you can’t measure and that you need to measure the right things or you won’t be steering towards the right outcome. For this session we will define the right outcome as “low risk to an organization from vulnerabilities in applications.” What are the right things to measure? How can we measure them? How can we use these application security metrics to drive towards low application risk. It would also be great if this could be translated into monetary risk to determine if an organizations investment in applications is not too much or too little. Some of the concepts discussed will be to take a portfolio view of application risk, assigning business risk to applications, counting defects, and measuring SDLC process performance. This is a big unsolved problem so come prepared with ideas and be willing to take part in a discussion. Includes discussion of CWSS 0.1. |
Revision as of 05:47, 20 December 2010
Global Summit 2011 Home Page
Global Summit 2011 Tracks
{{{summit_ws_logo}}} Counting and scoring application security defects | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Please see/use the 'discussion' page for more details about this Working Session | ||||||
Working Sessions Operational Rules - Please see here the general frame of rules. |
WORKING SESSION IDENTIFICATION | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Short Work Session Description | We all know that you can’t control what you can’t measure and that you need to measure the right things or you won’t be steering towards the right outcome. For this session we will define the right outcome as “low risk to an organization from vulnerabilities in applications.” What are the right things to measure? How can we measure them? How can we use these application security metrics to drive towards low application risk. It would also be great if this could be translated into monetary risk to determine if an organizations investment in applications is not too much or too little. Some of the concepts discussed will be to take a portfolio view of application risk, assigning business risk to applications, counting defects, and measuring SDLC process performance. This is a big unsolved problem so come prepared with ideas and be willing to take part in a discussion. Includes discussion of CWSS 0.1. | |||||
Related Projects (if any) |
| |||||
Email Contacts & Roles | Chair Chris Wysopal @ |
Operational Manager |
Mailing list {{{mailing_list}}} |
WORKING SESSION SPECIFICS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Objectives | ||||||
Venue/Date&Time/Model | Venue/Room OWASP Global Summit Portugal 2011 |
Date & Time
|
Discussion Model participants and attendees |
|
---|
WORKING SESSION OPERATIONAL RESOURCES | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Projector, whiteboards, markers, Internet connectivity, power |
|
---|
WORKING SESSION ADDITIONAL DETAILS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WORKING SESSION OUTCOMES / DELIVERABLES | ||
---|---|---|
Proposed by Working Group | Approved by OWASP Board | |
After the Board Meeting - fill in here. | ||
After the Board Meeting - fill in here. | ||
After the Board Meeting - fill in here. | ||
After the Board Meeting - fill in here. | ||
After the Board Meeting - fill in here. | ||
After the Board Meeting - fill in here. | ||
After the Board Meeting - fill in here. | ||
After the Board Meeting - fill in here. |
Working Session Participants
(Add you name by clicking "edit" on the tab on the upper left side of this page)
WORKING SESSION PARTICIPANTS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Company | Notes & reason for participating, issues to be discussed/addressed | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company1}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed1}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company2}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed2}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company3}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed3}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company4}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed4}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company5}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed5}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company6}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed6}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company7}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed7}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company8}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed8}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company9}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed9}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company10}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed10}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company11}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed11}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company12}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed12}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company13}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed13}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company14}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed14}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company15}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed15}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company16}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed16}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company17}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed17}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company18}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed18}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company19}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed19}}} | ||||
|
{{{summit_session_attendee_company20}}} |
{{{summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed20}}} |