This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2010-04-19"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 111: Line 111:
 
= - Please pay special attention to the [[:OWASP Reviews Dashboard|delayed ones]].<br>  
 
= - Please pay special attention to the [[:OWASP Reviews Dashboard|delayed ones]].<br>  
 
| Previous_Decisions_Comments_13 =
 
| Previous_Decisions_Comments_13 =
−
- Dinis informed he has begun reviewing the [http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Content_Validation_using_Java_Annotations_Project_-_SHIP_Validator_0.3_Release_-_Assessment#tab=First_Reviewer Content Validation using Java Annotations Project].
+
Neither Dinis or Brad have made significant progresses. We don't know about Matt.
 
| Previous_Follow_Up_13  
 
| Previous_Follow_Up_13  
−
= GPC members involved in review tasks, please report.
+
=  
 +
- Has Dinis contacted the Content Validation using Java Annotations Project leader.<br>
 +
- Has Brad contacted the EnDe Project leader?<br>
 +
- Matt please report on progress made regarding Content Validation using Java Annotations Project review.<br>
 
| Current_Decisions_Comments_13 =
 
| Current_Decisions_Comments_13 =
−
Neither Dinis or Brad have made significant progresses. We don't know about Matt.
+
 
 
| Current_Follow_Up_13  
 
| Current_Follow_Up_13  
 
=
 
=
−
- Dinis will contact the Content Validation using Java Annotations Project leader.<br>
+
 
−
- Brad will contact the EnDe Project leader.
 
  
  
Line 132: Line 134:
 
- The [[:Category:OWASP Top Ten Project|OWASP Top Ten Project]]'s project leader has invited M. Boberski to review the project against the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0|assessment criteria 2.0]]. As a result, M. Boberski has raised a set of questions about the criteria.  
 
- The [[:Category:OWASP Top Ten Project|OWASP Top Ten Project]]'s project leader has invited M. Boberski to review the project against the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0|assessment criteria 2.0]]. As a result, M. Boberski has raised a set of questions about the criteria.  
 
| Previous_Decisions_Comments_14 =
 
| Previous_Decisions_Comments_14 =
−
- Dinis has built a [[Assessment Criteria v2.0 FAQ|FAQ wiki page]] to answer M.and to more broadly make our responses available for future assessment criteria's users.
 
−
- Has been decided the GPC will fill in the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0 FAQ|FAQ wiki page]].<br>
 
−
- Has been decided Brad will contact M. Boberski by phone.
 
−
| Previous_Follow_Up_14
 
−
=
 
−
- GPC report on the progress made.
 
−
- Brad report on progress made.
 
−
| Current_Decisions_Comments_14 =
 
 
- Brad tried successively to call M. Bobersky without success.<br>
 
- Brad tried successively to call M. Bobersky without success.<br>
 
- Has been decided to pause these de-marches until new evaluation.<br>   
 
- Has been decided to pause these de-marches until new evaluation.<br>   
 
- Has been decided to offer to Top Ten's leader, Dave, 2 GPC reviewers.<br>
 
- Has been decided to offer to Top Ten's leader, Dave, 2 GPC reviewers.<br>
 
- Has been decided to remove the criterion 'compliance with OWASP Template for Docs' from the Documents Assessment Criteria.
 
- Has been decided to remove the criterion 'compliance with OWASP Template for Docs' from the Documents Assessment Criteria.
−
| Current_Follow_Up_14 =
+
| Previous_Follow_Up_14
 +
=  
 
- Has the GPC filled in the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0 FAQ|FAQ wiki page]]?
 
- Has the GPC filled in the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0 FAQ|FAQ wiki page]]?
 
- Has the criterion 'compliance with OWASP Template for Docs' been removed from the Documents Assessment Criteria? (Paulo's task).<br>
 
- Has the criterion 'compliance with OWASP Template for Docs' been removed from the Documents Assessment Criteria? (Paulo's task).<br>
 
- Has Matt been contacted and been asked if he can be Top Ten's reviewer? (Brad's task)
 
- Has Matt been contacted and been asked if he can be Top Ten's reviewer? (Brad's task)
−
 
+
| Current_Decisions_Comments_14 =
 +
| Current_Follow_Up_14 =
  
 
| Previous_Issue_15
 
| Previous_Issue_15

Revision as of 18:12, 1 March 2010

GLOBAL PROJECTS COMMITTEE'S MEETINGS
Previous Current Next
2010-02-22 2010-03-01 2010-03-08


AGENDA - NEW ISSUES
Description Aditional Info Decisions/Comments Follow Up
- Agenda template
  • [Ref=01_Issue_Fev10]
  • Task owner: Paulo & Dinis
 - The proposal has been finished and is ready to be assessed by the GPC. The template was considered fit for its propose. This issue has been closed.
AGENDA - ISSUES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS
Description Aditional Info Decisions/Comments Follow Up
-Reviewers Drive
  • [Ref=01_Issue_Jan10]
  • Task owner: Brad & Paulo
 - The proposed templates have been finished.

- Please note the second table is still being populated.
- A text to be used as Reviewers Drive's overview is being needed - volunteers?

The column 'Projects I would be interested in reviewing' has been changed to allow it receiving text. Has Brad drafted a Reviewer Drive's Overview?
- OWASP Project Details Tab's review.
  • [Ref=02_Issue_Jan10]
  • Task owner: Jason
 - This task has been assumed by Jason, Dinis.

- See detailed info on the templates set.
- See also Jason's the methodology explanation.
- Jason will continue working on it to finished up a couple of questions still open and to document all the process.
- As soon as the OWASP Project Details Tab has been reviewed it will be spreaded through ALL OWASP Projects.
- Throughout last week, Dinis has also been working on this issue as well.

Jason informed the template review has been finished and the documentation is still to be done. - Has Jason built documentation up?

- Has Jason added a new category for release's status, i.e. 'under review'?
- Has Dinis worked as well to improve the template?
- Has Paulo tried and used the new template?

- Projects under review.
  • [Ref=03_Issue_Jan10]
  • Task owner: Matt, Dinis, Brad.
 - Please pay special attention to the delayed ones.
 Neither Dinis or Brad have made significant progresses. We don't know about Matt. - Has Dinis contacted the Content Validation using Java Annotations Project leader.

- Has Brad contacted the EnDe Project leader?
- Matt please report on progress made regarding Content Validation using Java Annotations Project review.

- Mike Boberski's questions about the assessment criteria 2.0.
  • [Ref=04_Issue_Jan10]
  • Task owner: Brad
 - The task below has been assumed by Brad.

- The OWASP Top Ten Project's project leader has invited M. Boberski to review the project against the assessment criteria 2.0. As a result, M. Boberski has raised a set of questions about the criteria.

- Brad tried successively to call M. Bobersky without success.

- Has been decided to pause these de-marches until new evaluation.
- Has been decided to offer to Top Ten's leader, Dave, 2 GPC reviewers.
- Has been decided to remove the criterion 'compliance with OWASP Template for Docs' from the Documents Assessment Criteria.

- Has the GPC filled in the FAQ wiki page?

- Has the criterion 'compliance with OWASP Template for Docs' been removed from the Documents Assessment Criteria? (Paulo's task).
- Has Matt been contacted and been asked if he can be Top Ten's reviewer? (Brad's task)

- OWASP services outsourcing bids' wiki page.
  • [Ref=05_Issue_Jan10]
  • Task owner: Brad
 - Regarding the creation of covers for OWASP Books, Brad has proposed we move the process to a volunteer, without buying the source files. This question has triggered the decision of creating a wiki page to support OWASP services outsourcing bids.

- Brad has assumed this task.

- Gather information about services currently being bought by OWASP. - Waiting for information from Alison.

- Brad report on progress made.

- Brad will build a straw up for GPC review.

- Brad will upload the collected information.

- Has Brad built the straw up and uploaded the collected information?
- Wiki Expert & Content Creation Expert's Job Description.
  • [Ref=06_Issue_Jan10]
  • Task owner: TBD
 - Job description to support the recruitment of two new GPC members

- Jeff, who had previously assumed this task, couldn't find the spare cycles to finished this up.

- GPC needs one of its members to assume this task which currently orphaned.
- Due to the shortage of meeting attendance wasn't possible to find a volunteer to assume this task. - GPC needs one of its members to assume this task which currently orphaned.
Meeting Attendance
Paulo, Dinis, Jason and Brad.


Retrieved from "https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=GPC_Agenda_2010-04-19&oldid=79065"