This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2010-02-22"
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
| Current_Decisions_Comments_13 = | | Current_Decisions_Comments_13 = | ||
| Current_Follow_Up_13 = | | Current_Follow_Up_13 = | ||
− | | Previous_Issue_14 = | + | |
− | | Previous_Additional_Info_14 = | + | | Previous_Issue_14 |
+ | = | ||
+ | - Mike Boberski's [http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcn8962c_63fgm7gbfd questions] about the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0|assessment criteria 2.0]]. | ||
+ | | Previous_Additional_Info_14 | ||
+ | = | ||
+ | - The task below has been assumed by Brad. <br> | ||
+ | - The [[:Category:OWASP Top Ten Project|OWASP Top Ten Project]]'s project leader has invited M. Boberski to review the project against the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0|assessment criteria 2.0]]. As a result, M. Boberski has raised a set of questions about the criteria. | ||
| Previous_Decisions_Comments_14 = | | Previous_Decisions_Comments_14 = | ||
− | | Previous_Follow_Up_14 = | + | - Dinis has built a [[Assessment Criteria v2.0 FAQ|FAQ wiki page]] to answer M.and to more broadly make our responses available for future assessment criteria's users. |
+ | - Has been decided the GPC will fill in the [[Assessment Criteria v2.0 FAQ|FAQ wiki page]]. | ||
+ | - Has been decided Brad will contact M. Boberski by phone. | ||
+ | | Previous_Follow_Up_14 | ||
+ | = | ||
+ | - GPC report on the progress made. | ||
+ | - Brad's report on progress made. | ||
| Current_Decisions_Comments_14 = | | Current_Decisions_Comments_14 = | ||
| Current_Follow_Up_14 = | | Current_Follow_Up_14 = |
Revision as of 16:30, 22 February 2010
GLOBAL PROJECTS COMMITTEE'S MEETINGS | ||
Previous | Current | Next |
2010-02-15 | 2010-02-22 | 2010-03-01 |
AGENDA - NEW ISSUES | |||
Description | Aditional Info | Decisions/Comments | Follow Up |
AGENDA - ISSUES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS | |||
Description | Aditional Info | Decisions/Comments | Follow Up |
- Reviewers Drive. | - This task has been assumed by Brad & Paulo. - The proposed templates have been finished. |
- The outcome was considered fit for purpose. - Dinis asked for changing the column 'Projects I would be interested in reviewing' to allow it receiving text, i.e. to allow the volunteers to specify their broad interests instead of obliging them to point out project names and its links. |
- Due to lack of GPC's members attendance, this item will be dealt with again next meeting. - Next setps? |
- Decisions to to be made in the current meeting. | - Follow up from the current meeting. | ||
- OWASP Project Details Tab's review. | - This task has been assumed by Jason, Dinis.
- As soon as the OWASP Project Details Tab has been reviewed it will be spreaded through ALL OWASP Projects.
- Jason has pushed the new template forward. See detailed info on the templates set. See also Jason's the methodology explanation. |
- Due to the lack of usage it has been decided to hide the variable 'Project Maintainer' and only show it when needed.
- Everyone agreed the new template means a lot of progress in GPC methodologies and is expected it will help both project leaders and project management. |
- Has this task been finished? - Are there any available instructions/documentation? |
Projects under review. | - Please pay special attention to the delayed ones. |
- Dinis informed he has begun reviewing the Content Validation using Java Annotations Project. | GPC members involved in review tasks, please report. |
- Mike Boberski's questions about the assessment criteria 2.0. | - The task below has been assumed by Brad. - The OWASP Top Ten Project's project leader has invited M. Boberski to review the project against the assessment criteria 2.0. As a result, M. Boberski has raised a set of questions about the criteria. |
- Dinis has built a FAQ wiki page to answer M.and to more broadly make our responses available for future assessment criteria's users.
- Has been decided the GPC will fill in the FAQ wiki page. - Has been decided Brad will contact M. Boberski by phone. |
- GPC report on the progress made.
- Brad's report on progress made. |
Meeting Attendance |
test |