Revision as of 15:45, 12 October 2009

Previous meetings and Dial-in details

see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda and the Dial-In details

New Assessment Criteria
- Release Assessment
  - Pravir's diagram,
  - Matt's illustration.

Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership:
- Community's adhesion has been very limited if any - See the "OWASP Projects Dashboard",
- Achim's questions,
- It seems we haven't been clear and confused project leaders with the distinction between "contributors" and ""past_leaders_special_contributions",
- Action must be taken.

Spreading OWASP Project Details Tab through ALL OWASP Projects.
Waiting until we come up with revised&improved wiki code to either link project with release and to consider the below referred,
- Consider having a single release roadmap page that is not attached to a single version but instead is the summation of the various release roadmaps.
  - The single page is easier for project leaders to find/edit
  - The single page would show the progression of the project to external audiences
  - Makes the release roadmap very similar to a changelog - which is more useful if its in one place rather then in bits attached to releases.

Projects committee should determine which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc.....
- Matt Tesauro's draft to deal with this kind of issues.

Committee members' evaluation process.
- "GPC - Send 'Individual Committee Member' online form".

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 ----
-*Spreading [[:Template:OWASP Project Identification Tab|OWASP Project Details Tab]] through [[ [[OWASP Projects Dashboard||ALL OWASP Projects]].
+*Spreading [[:Template:OWASP Project Identification Tab|OWASP Project Details Tab]] through [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|ALL OWASP Projects]].
 *Waiting until we come up with revised&improved wiki code to either link project with release and to consider the below referred,
 **Consider having a single release roadmap page that is not attached to a single version but instead is the summation of the various release roadmaps.