This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Fail securely"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Overview)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
==Overview==
 
==Overview==
  
Applications regularly fail to process transactions for many reasons. How they fail can determine if an application is secure or not.  
+
Handling errors securely is a key aspect of secure coding. There are two different types of errors that deserve special attention. The first is exceptions that occur in the processing of a countermeasure itself. It's important that these exceptions do not enable behavior that the countermeasure would normally not allow. As a developer, you should consider that there are generally three possible outcomes from a security mechanism:
 +
* allow the operation
 +
* disallow the operation
 +
* exception
 +
 
 +
In general, you should design your security mechanism so that a failure will follow the same execution path as disallowing the operation.  For example, security methods like isAuthorized(), isAuthenticated(), and validate() should all return false if there is an exception during processing.
 +
 
 +
The other type of security-relevant exception is outside specific security mechanisms, but may affect the control flow that invokes such mechanisms.
  
 
For example:  
 
For example:  

Revision as of 16:12, 14 June 2006

This is a principle or a set of principles. To view all principles, please see the Principle Category page.

This article is a stub. You can help OWASP by expanding it or discussing it on its Talk page.


Overview

Handling errors securely is a key aspect of secure coding. There are two different types of errors that deserve special attention. The first is exceptions that occur in the processing of a countermeasure itself. It's important that these exceptions do not enable behavior that the countermeasure would normally not allow. As a developer, you should consider that there are generally three possible outcomes from a security mechanism:

  • allow the operation
  • disallow the operation
  • exception

In general, you should design your security mechanism so that a failure will follow the same execution path as disallowing the operation. For example, security methods like isAuthorized(), isAuthenticated(), and validate() should all return false if there is an exception during processing.

The other type of security-relevant exception is outside specific security mechanisms, but may affect the control flow that invokes such mechanisms.

For example:

isAdmin = true; 
try { 
  codeWhichMayFail(); 
  isAdmin = isUserInRole( “Administrator” ); 
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
  log.write(ex.toString()); 
} 

If codeWhichMayFail() fails, the user is an admin by default. This is obviously a security risk.