This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information: Live CD 2008 Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
− | 1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | + | 1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment#Alpha_Quality_Tool_Criteria|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? |
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
− | + | See comments, section 3 | |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
− | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | + | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment#Beta_Quality_Tool_Criteria|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? |
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
− | + | See comments, section 3 | |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
− | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | + | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment#Release_Quality_Tool_Criteria|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? |
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
− | + | Criteria assessed: Ease of Use [straightforward]; Online Documentation [has been provided]; Build Instructions [have been provided]; Bug Tracking [provided]; Code Repository at Google Code [provided]; Release Notes [have been provided]; overall 100% complete; 100% compliant with OWASP Project Assessment Methology | |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| |
Latest revision as of 14:42, 5 March 2009
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I |
| |
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
Project objective was to review the functionality of previous OWASP LiveCD's, install updated tools, and add complementary tools to broaden the scope of the offering. 100% completed. | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
100% complete per proposed deliverables. | |
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
This reviewer believes that OWASP needs to take steps to distinguish LiveCD SOC 2008 and other versions of the OWASP LiveCD. Please google "OWASP LiveCD" - if there is any doubt about the potential for confusion. OWASP LiveCD contributors should please CLEARLY LABEL their OWASP LiveCD initiatives, such as "OWASP LiveCD SOC 2008, or OWASP LiveCD SOC 2006". There will likely be an "OWASP LiveCD SOC 2009". Absolutely the contributions are welcome, but let's try to avoid confusing our users ! | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
See comments, section 3 | |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
See comments, section 3 | |
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
Criteria assessed: Ease of Use [straightforward]; Online Documentation [has been provided]; Build Instructions [have been provided]; Bug Tracking [provided]; Code Repository at Google Code [provided]; Release Notes [have been provided]; overall 100% complete; 100% compliant with OWASP Project Assessment Methology | |
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Please see comments in section 4, above. A more-detailed OWASP LiveCD distro identification scheme is needed, and it needs to be back-ported to any work referred to as ("googable as") "OWASP LiveCD". |